Reading Comprehension

PT117 · S1 · P4 · Q26 The Modern Movement

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Start practicing free

The proponents of the Modern Movement in architecture considered that, compared with the historical styles that it replaced, Modernist architecture more accurately reflected the functional spirit of twentieth-century technology and was better suited to the newest building methods.

Topic

The rise and decline of Modernist architecture, focusing on its ideals versus practical realities in building methods.

Framework

Old / New

Main Point

Although the Modern Movement in architecture aimed to express the technological and functional spirit of the twentieth century, its rigid ideology eventually conflicted with actual building practices, leading to its decline as Postmodern architecture recognized and addressed these limitations. ( - End of P1 - End of P4)

P1: Introduction—Modernist Ideals vs. Reality

Modernist architecture was supposed to match the spirit of new technology and be suitable for modern building techniques, but ironically, its design ideology didn't fit well with how buildings were actually constructed.

P2: Ascent of Modernism and Its Blind Spots

Modernism started out as a rebel movement, but soon took over mainstream architecture. Its proponents became elitist, caring more about pushing their vision than serving clients, and critics often misrepresented architects' work by ignoring non-Modern features.

P3: Why Modernism Declined—Practical & Conceptual Issues

Modernist architects misunderstood real construction processes and wouldn't admit that their work was mostly about looks, not function. As the construction industry became more specialized, it was nearly impossible to build Modernist designs "honestly" without extreme expense and impractical expectations.

26.

The author of the passage mentions Otto Wagner and the young Frank Lloyd Wright (last sentence of the second paragraph) primarily as examples of

  1. innovative architects whose work was

    Out of Scope: delayed appreciation

    We have to match our answer up with the passage, which tells us these two things about Wagner and Frank: - they got identified as innovators - proponents of Modernism drew attention to the Modern aspects of their work, conveniently ignoring other aspects No part of that support text sounds like "the public took a while to appreciate it".

    7% picked this

  2. Correct

    architects whom proponents of the

    Why this is right

    This is the best match for our support text: - they got identified as innovators - proponents of Modernism only drew attention to the Modern aspects of their work, conveniently ignoring other aspects The verb 'claimed' probably feels pretty out of scope, since we only heard that proponents of Modernism drew attention to the Modern features and conveniently ignored the non-Modern features. But the wider context of the 2nd paragraph helps to inform this answer choice (such is usually the case on Local Purpose questions). The Modern Movement is insisting on itself. It's dominating mainstream architecture and criticism. Architects who aren't doing Modern stuff are ignored by proponents. So when an architect gets as famous as Wagner and Wright, the proponents can't just ignore them, so they have to pretend like Wagner and Wright are Modernists themselves, by accentuating their Modern aspects and downplaying their non-Modern aspects.

    Skill tested: Local Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    74% picked this

  3. architects whose work helped to

    Out of Scope: popularize Modernism

    The available support text doesn't say anything about Wagner and Wright being examples of architects whose work helped to popularize Modernism. They're just identified as architects who got some fame for being innovative. The proponents of the Modern Movement tried to act like Wagner and Wright were doing Modern stuff (by ignoring the non-Modern aspects of their work), but the passage doesn't say that Wagner and Wright made the Modern Movement more popular. If anything, it sounds like the Movement was already popular by 1945, when its tenets had come to dominate mainstream architecture.

    9% picked this

  4. architects who generally attempted to

    Out of Scope: interpret / dictate

    The available support text says nothing about whether Wagner or Wright were more likely to interpret their clients' needs or dictate what should be done with the client's place.

    1% picked this

  5. architects whose early work seemed

    Too Strong: at odds Wrong Purpose

    The passage doesn't specify "early work", but since we're talking about them when they were first being identified as innovators, it's pretty reasonable to allow that language. Is the author presenting them "as a case of architects whose work was at odds with the principles of Modernism"? No. The passage reveals that there are definitely some aspects of their work that is at odds with Modernism. But it also says that there were features of their work that were harmonious with Modernism. The author brought them up "as a case of popular architects whom the proponents of Modernism would try to appreciate as though their work was Modern."

    9% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill
LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free