Reading Comprehension

PT117 · S1 · P2 · Q9 Historiography

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

In the field of historiography—the writing of history based on a critical examination of authentic primary information sources—one area that has recently attracted attention focuses on the responses of explorers and settlers to new landscapes in order to provide insights into the transformations the landscape itself has undergone as a result of settlement.

Topic

The importance of including Chinese settlers' perspectives and contributions when studying the history of how the Pacific Coast landscape was transformed by settlement.

Framework

Old / New

Main Point

Recent historiographers argue that to fully understand the transformation of the Pacific Coast's landscape, it's necessary to look beyond traditional written records from European American explorers and include the actions and contributions of Chinese settlers, whose innovative approaches to agriculture reshaped the region. ( - P2; - P4)

P1: Traditional Sources for Studying Pacific Coast History

Historians have usually relied on the detailed written reports from 19th-century European American explorers to study how explorers and settlers responded to the Pacific Coast landscape.

P2: Reevaluating What Counts as a Source

Recently, some scholars have pointed out that these traditional records ignore Asian settlers, mostly because there’s a lack of written documents from them. These historians suggest it's important to also look at other kinds of evidence—like settlers' actions—to get a fuller picture.

P3: Chinese Settlers’ Different Approach to the Land

The passage gives examples of how Chinese settlers saw agricultural opportunities in places others didn’t, using resources like swamps and wild mustard in innovative ways that differed from European settlers.

9.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the author's primary purpose in discussing Chinese settlers in the third paragraph?

  1. to suggest that Chinese settlers

    Too Strong

    Too Strong: typical Out of Scope: settlement patterns The passage doesn't discuss any settlement patterns, nor does it say that the Chinese settlers were following a typical pattern.

    1% picked this

  2. to argue that little written

    Weaker Match

    Weaker Match: Wrong Half of Target Sentence We're looking for an answer that sounds like the final sentence of the 2nd paragraph, but the final sentence of the 2nd paragraph actually has two separate claims: 1. Because a full study cannot confine itself to the little written evidence we have of Chinese settlers' practices, 2. Historiographers are seeing the value in recognizing other kinds of evidence, such as the actions of Asian settlers This answer choice is saying that the 3rd paragraph is trying to convince us of #1, that there isn't much written evidence. But the 3rd paragraph is supporting #2.

    1% picked this

  3. Correct

    to provide examples illustrating the

    Why this is right

    This correct answer reinforces the last sentence of the 2nd paragraph, in the sense that it acknowledges that the 3rd paragraph, which is about Chinese settlers, was used as a case in point for a generalization made about Asian settlers more broadly. The language about "illustrating their unique view" matches up with the first sentence of the 4th paragraph, which says "The Chinese settlers offered more than just a new view of the land." The examples in the 3rd paragraph certainly qualify as illustrations of Chinese (thus, Asian) settlers having an innovative outlook on the potential of the environment.

    Skill tested: Local Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    88% picked this

  4. to demonstrate that the history

    Out of Scope: contention

    Contentious discussions are heated, argumentative discussions. "A point of contention" is used in milder contexts like negotiations, but it still indicates a gridlocked disagreement. We don't have any support for the idea that historiographers are fighting over the settlements; they're just collectively broadening their sense of what a source can be.

    2% picked this

  5. to claim that the historical

    Out of Scope: inconsistent

    There's nothing in the final sentence of the 2nd paragraph (or in the 3rd paragraph) that says the actions of the Asian settlers contradict history as derived from traditional sources.

    9% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free