Reading Comprehension

PT117 · S1 · P2 · Q8 Historiography

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one
Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step
81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

In the field of historiography—the writing of history based on a critical examination of authentic primary information sources—one area that has recently attracted attention focuses on the responses of explorers and settlers to new landscapes in order to provide insights into the transformations the landscape itself has undergone as a result of settlement.

Topic

The importance of including Chinese settlers' perspectives and contributions when studying the history of how the Pacific Coast landscape was transformed by settlement.

Framework

Old / New

Main Point

Recent historiographers argue that to fully understand the transformation of the Pacific Coast's landscape, it's necessary to look beyond traditional written records from European American explorers and include the actions and contributions of Chinese settlers, whose innovative approaches to agriculture reshaped the region. ( - P2; - P4)

P1: Traditional Sources for Studying Pacific Coast History

Historians have usually relied on the detailed written reports from 19th-century European American explorers to study how explorers and settlers responded to the Pacific Coast landscape.

P2: Reevaluating What Counts as a Source

Recently, some scholars have pointed out that these traditional records ignore Asian settlers, mostly because there’s a lack of written documents from them. These historians suggest it's important to also look at other kinds of evidence—like settlers' actions—to get a fuller picture.

P3: Chinese Settlers’ Different Approach to the Land

The passage gives examples of how Chinese settlers saw agricultural opportunities in places others didn’t, using resources like swamps and wild mustard in innovative ways that differed from European settlers.

Which one of the following most accurately states the main point of the passage?

The history of settlement along
Too Strong
Too Strong: most / confirmed Wrong Emphasis: doesn't address New The main clause here is, The history of settlement along the Pacific Coast of the U.S. is confirmed by evidence reconstructed from the actions of Asian settlers. The passage never talked about confirming an old view of history. The passage also never gave us a generalization about how most historiographers understood the history of that coast. We should also be bothered by the fact that the New thing in historiography isn't being mentioned at all in this answer.
6% picked this
Asian settlers on the Pacific
Too Narrow
Too Narrow: Asian settlers Too Strong: irrelevant We don't have any textual support for the strongly worded idea that traditional historiographers thought that the records left by Asian settlers were irrelevant. This answer also doesn't capture the New thing in historiography, the Theme that is being spotlighted by talking about the Pacific Coast. There's nothing in here about this new focus on the response of explorers and settlers, about the newfound willingness to consider the actions of settlers to be a primary source.
4% picked this
Correct
To understand Asian settlers’ impact
Why this is right
This is capturing the New thing happening in historiography. Traditionally, they would just consider documents and records. But now there's a willingness to consider the actions and responses of settlers. By applying this new mindset to the history of the Pacific Coast of the U.S., historiographers are better able to capture the impact of Asian settlers on transforming that landscape. The phrasing of, "to understand the impact, historiographers have had to recognize the value of nontraditional evidence" matches up well with our two author tone moments: "a full study of a culture's historical relationship to its land cannot confine itself to a narrow record of experience" "X cannot be fully understood by historiographers without attention to the input of Chinese settlers as reconstructed from their interactions with that landscape".
Skill tested: Main Point · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.
81% picked this
Spurred by new findings regarding
Out of Scope
Out of Scope: debating foundations Reversed Causal Relationship The New thing going down in historiography is an expansion of how they define "a source". There was nothing in the passage about historiographers debating the foundations of historiography. But even if we accept that "recognizing they need to expand their definition of what a source is" means that they're "debating the methodological foundations" of their field, we can't support the causal claim this answer makes. This answer says that "there were new findings regarding Asian settlements on the Pacific U.S. Coast" and those new findings caused the historiographers to expand their definition of what a source is. But the causal relationship in the passage is the reverse. Spurred by an expanded definition of what a source is, historiographers were able to uncover new findings about Asian settlers on the Pacific U.S. Coast.
7% picked this
By examining only written information,
Wrong Emphasis
Wrong Emphasis: missing Pacific Coast Out of Scope: inaccurate accounts Too Strong: only Every paragraph of the passage talks about the Pacific Coast of the U.S. But the main point answer doesn't reference it at all? That's fishy. We also don't have support for the strongly worded claim that historiography in the past has examined only written information. And the author nowhere says that historiography has produced inaccurate historical accounts (although the author would probably say that their account of the Pacific Coast had so far been "incomplete").
2% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free