Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT116 S4 P3 Q16 Explanation

Native American Autobiography

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsMeaning in ContextHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

In studying the autobiographies of Native Americans, most scholars have focused on as-told-to life histories that were solicited, translated, recorded, and edited by non-Native American collaborators—that emerged from “bicultural composite authorship”. Limiting their studies to such written documents, these scholars have overlooked traditional, preliterate modes of communicating personal history. In addition, they and writing that underlie the concept of an autobiography—that indeed constitute the English word’s root meaning.

The idea of self was, in a number of pre-contact Native American cultures, markedly inclusive: identity was not merely individual, but also relational to a society, a specific landscape, and the cosmos. Within these cultures, the expression of life experiences tended to be oriented toward current events: with the participation of fellow one person might require the enactment of that vision in the form of a tribal pageant.

One can view as autobiographical the elaborate tattoos that symbolized a warrior’s valorous deeds, and such artifacts as a decorated shield that communicated the accomplishments and aspirations of its maker, or a robe that was emblazoned with the pictographic history of the wearer’s battles and was sometimes used in reenactments. Also autobiographical, of its owner, who was often assisted in the painting by other tribal members.

A tribe would, then, have contributed to the individual’s narrative not merely passively, by its social codes and expectations, but actively by joining in the expression of that narrative. Such intercultural collaboration may seem alien to the European style of autobiography, yet any autobiography is shaped by its creator’s ideas about the additionally have been shaped by the cultural perspectives of the people who transmitted them.

What this question is testing

Meaning in Context

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
16.

Which one of the following most accurately conveys the meaning of the phrase “bicultural composite authorship” as it is used in the first

Answer choices

  1. Bad Match: based on artifacts14% picked this

    written by a member of one culture but based on the artifacts and oral traditions

    These autobiographies were indeed written by a member of one culture (Euro-American), but they were based on the oral testimony of the Native American whose life story was being presented. It wasn't based on any artifacts or on the oral traditions of the culture.

  2. Bad Match3% picked this

    written by two people, each of whom belongs to a different culture but contributes in the same way

    Bad Match: written by two / same way These biographies had a Native American speaking their life history aloud, to a Euro-American who recorded it and then later went back, listened to the tape, decided which portions to put into the book, and then translated those portions. So there was only ever one person writing, and the two people definitely didn't contribute in the same way. One of them contributed by telling their life story. The other contributed by being a scribe that translated their words and decided on which chunks of the story to put into the autobiography.

  3. Out of Scope: compiled from writings3% picked this

    compiled from the writings of people who come from different cultures and whose identities

    These autobiographies weren't compiled from any writings. The Native American person just spoke their life history aloud. The autobiography was compiled from recordings of a Native American person talking about their life in their native language.

  4. Bad Match: different writer vs. editor24% picked this

    written originally by a member of one culture but edited and revised by a member

    This doesn't match because the writer and the editor and the recorder and the solicitor and the translator were all the Euro-American person. The Native American person just spoke their life history aloud.

  5. Correct56% picked this

    written by a member of one culture but based on oral communication by a member

    Why this is right

    We call these "as-told-to" life histories because the Native American told their life story to the Euro American who solicited the interview. Once that oral communication was recorded, the Euro-American translated it and edited into a written document.

    Skill tested: Meaning in Context · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free