Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT116 S1 P2 Q9 Explanation

Code-Switching

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsParagraph PurposeSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

In many bilingual communities of Puerto Rican Americans living in the mainland United States, people use both English and Spanish in a single conversation, alternating between them smoothly and frequently even within the same sentence. This practice—called code-switching—is common in bilingual populations. While there are some cases that cannot currently factors, either situational or rhetorical, explain the use of code-switching.

Linguists say that most code-switching among Puerto Rican Americans is sensitive to the social contexts, which researchers refer to as domains, in which conversations take place. The main conversational factors influencing the occurrence of code-switching are setting, participants, and topic. When these go together naturally they are said to be congruent; a the setting “beach” yielded less agreement on the third factor of topic and on language choice.

But situational factors do not account for all code-switching; it occurs even when the domain would lead one not to expect it. In these cases, one language tends to be the primary one, while the other is used only sparingly to achieve certain rhetorical effects. Often the switches are so subtle that commented that it was used to express certain attitudes such as intimacy or humor more emphatically.

What this question is testing

Paragraph Purpose

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
9.

The primary function of the third paragraph of the passage

Answer choices

  1. Contradicted: different explanation6% picked this

    consider a general explanation for the phenomenon of code-switching that is different from the one discussed

    This is tempting in the sense that the 3rd paragraph talks about reasons for code-switching (Rhetorical ones) that are different from the reasons discussed in the preceding paragraph. The 2nd paragraph talked about situational reasons for code-switching. But this answer is saying, that the 3rd paragraph is offering a general (encompassing) explanation for code-switching that is different from what we've mentioned in both paragraphs. There is not a NEW explanation being offered here. The 1st paragraph established that the vast majority of code-switching is situational or rhetorical. The 2nd paragraph covered situational and the 3rd paragraph is covering rhetorical. Those two paragraphs are two components of the general explanation offered in the 1st paragraph.

  2. Out of Scope: apparent conflict0% picked this

    resolve an apparent conflict between two explanations for code-switching that were discussed in

    In the 1st paragraph, the author's thesis said that the vast majority of code-switching is due to situational or rhetorical factors. This 3rd paragraph isn't resolving a conflict between two explanations; it's providing the 2nd part of a two-pronged explanation provided at the end of the 1st paragraph.

  3. Correct87% picked this

    show that there are instances of code-switching that are not explained by the factors discussed

    Why this is right

    This answer actually resembles a lot of the language in the opening sentence of this paragraph, which is a typical feature of correct answers on Paragraph Purpose. We know the 3rd paragraph is here to talk about rhetorical factors, after the 2nd paragraph covered situational factors. The opening sentence, "But situational factors do not account for all code-switching" matches well with "but there are instances of code-switching not explained by the [situational] factors discussed in the previous paragraph".

    Skill tested: Paragraph Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Too Narrow1% picked this

    report some of the patterns of code-switching observed among a family of Puerto Rican Americans

    The author does refer to a study that involved a Puerto Rican family, but that is an example used to illuminate a broader point. The author wasn't trying to get us to learn something specific about patterns of code-switching in a Puerto Rican family. She wanted us to understand that the other impetus for code-switching (besides situational factors) is rhetorical factors. And the study with the Puerto Rican family helps support that broader framing idea. Also, we're never told that the Puerto Rican Americans are living in another community. It seems like they are living in America. We aren't told otherwise.

  5. Wrong Emphasis: unconscious vs. rhetorical6% picked this

    show that some instances of code-switching

    This, like (D), is getting too lost in the details. We need to pay attention to the broader framing ideas that set the stage at the outset of the paragraph. The author is trying to emphasize that in addition to situational factors causing code-switching, there are also cases where rhetorical factors are the cause. A subsidiary comment is, "when it's rhetorical ... they often are not even aware of them, such as in this study of a Puerto Rican family". But the objective of the 3rd paragraph is to talk about rhetorically-caused code switching, to deliver on the 2nd half of the thesis statement at the end of the 1st paragraph.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free