Reading Comprehension

PT116 · S1 · P2 · Q13 Code-Switching

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

In many bilingual communities of Puerto Rican Americans living in the mainland United States, people use both English and Spanish in a single conversation, alternating between them smoothly and frequently even within the same sentence.

Topic

The practice and underlying reasons for code-switching between English and Spanish among Puerto Rican Americans in the mainland United States.

Framework

Answer / Explain

Main Point

Most code-switching among Puerto Rican Americans can be explained by situational and rhetorical factors, even though there are some exceptions; the language mix typically depends on the context of the conversation, but sometimes people switch for subtle, expressive reasons. ( - end of P1, and the final paragraph gives examples of exceptions and rhetorical reasons.)

P1: Introduction to Code-Switching

Puerto Rican Americans in the US often switch between English and Spanish during conversations—even in the same sentence. This common practice is called code-switching, and for the most part, it's explained by subtle situational or rhetorical factors.

P2: How Social Context (Domains) Influences Code-Switching

Linguists say code-switching mostly depends on the social context—where you are, who you're with, and what's being discussed (called "domains" like family, friendship, etc.). A study had students decide which language they'd use in various social situations, and generally, when the situation was straightforward or “congruent,” students were consistent and agreed; when the factors didn’t naturally fit together, there was less agreement about language choice.

P3: Exceptions—Rhetorical Code-Switching and Subtle Use

Not all code-switching fits these situational patterns; sometimes people switch languages for expressive or rhetorical reasons, even if the context suggests otherwise. For example, a family thought they only used English at home, but recordings showed brief Spanish usage—mainly to express attitudes like intimacy or humor more strongly.

13.

Which one of the following, if true, would most cast doubt on the author's interpretation of the study involving the family discussed in the third paragraph?

  1. Correct

    In a previous twelve-month study

    Why this is right

    This goes against the first sentence of the 3rd paragraph. The author presents the Puerto Rican family as an example of code-switching that took place even though situational factors were not the reason. This answer is strongly suggesting that situational factors were the reason for the code-switching, since the only times they switched language was when situation factors changed dramatically.

    Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    61% picked this

  2. In a subsequent twelve-month study

    Compatible

    The author presents the Puerto Rican family as an example of code-switching that took place even though situational factors were not the reason. So this answer sounds very consistent with that. Since situational factors supposedly aren't causing this code-switching, we wouldn't expect a change in situational factors to have an effect on the code-switching.

    9% picked this

  3. In a subsequent twelve-month study

    Weaker Impact

    Whereas (A) made it sound like the code-switching was from situational factors, this feels like it's supporting the idea that code-switching wasn't from rhetorical factors. The family switched into Spanish sporadically, supposedly for rhetorical reasons such as expressing intimacy or humor. Does the fact that they also used English to express intimacy or humor undermine that notion? Not really. The author wasn't saying that "every time they wanted to express intimacy or humor they used Spanish for rhetorical reasons", she was saying, "every time they used Spanish, it was to express intimacy or humor for rhetorical reasons".

    14% picked this

  4. When asked about the significance

    No Impact

    We don't really have any expectations about what language they would use if a researcher asks them about their use of Spanish, so the fact that the family replied in English doesn't clearly connect to or tell us anything.

    1% picked this

  5. Prior to their discussions with

    No Impact

    Does it undermine the legitimacy of what the family members said to the researchers (about the rhetorical purposes of their usage of Spanish) if we learn that the family members had never described their use of Spanish this way? No, not really. Maybe no one's really forced the family to reflect on their occasional use of Spanish. In fact, since we're told that the family believed themselves to be speaking only in English at home, there would be no reason for them to describe their occasional use of Spanish because they didn't even realize they were occasionally using Spanish.

    14% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free