Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT115 S3 P1 Q4 Explanation

Mexican Muralist Painters

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsNon-Author OpinionHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

The contemporary Mexican artistic movement known as muralism, a movement of public art that began with images painted on walls in an effort to represent Mexican national culture, is closely linked ideologically with its main sponsor, the new Mexican government elected in 1920 following the Mexican Revolution. This government promoted an ambitious myths, geography, and history of the local communities that constitute the basis of Mexican national culture.

But while many muralist works express populist or nationalist ideas, it is a mistake to attempt to reduce Mexican mural painting to formulaic, official government art. It is more than merely the result of the changes in political and social awareness that the Mexican Revolution represented; it also reflected important innovations in enabled them to be freer in expression than were more traditional practitioners of this style.

Moreover, while they shared a common interest in rediscovering their Mexican national identity, they developed their own distinct styles. Rivera, for example, incorporated elements from pre-Columbian sculpture and the Italian Renaissance fresco into his murals and used a strange combination of mechanical shapes to depict the faces and bodies of people. Orozco, similar direction as Orozco, but incorporated asymmetric compositions, a high degree of action, and brilliant color.

This stylistic experimentation can be seen as resulting from the demands of a new medium. In stretching their concepts from small easel paintings with a centralized subject to vast compositions with mural dimensions, muralists learned to think big and to respect the sweeping gesture of the arm—the brush stroke required to achieve all parts, and to continue to be viewable as people moved across in front of them.

What this question is testing

Non-Author Opinion

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
4.

Based on the passage, with which one of the following statements about art would the muralists be most

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong17% picked this

    Art should be evaluated on the basis of its style and form rather than

    The muralists cared about all three of these things. They expressed populist and nationalist ideas, incorporated stylistic innovations, and were very mindful of the form of the mural medium. Their credo is that "art should incorporate images and familiar ideas as it comments upon the historic period in which it was created", so the content of their art was front and center in their mission.

  2. Too Strong: essential2% picked this

    Government sponsorship is essential to the flourishing

    Although the government did sponsor muralism, we can't point to anywhere in the text where these muralists are indicating that such sponsorship was essential to the flourishing of art. The passage suggests that even though the government was the catalyst for this movement, the artists were the ones deciding on the content and style.

  3. Contradicted, if anything2% picked this

    Realism is unsuited to large-scale public

    The end of the 2nd paragraph says that muralists "often used a realist style", so clearly those muralists thought that realism was suitable to large-scale public art.

  4. Correct79% picked this

    The use of techniques borrowed from other cultures can contribute to the rediscovery of

    Why this is right

    This is worth digging into because of the lovably weak strength of language is so weak: "this thing can contribute to that thing". Ironically, the support for it comes mainly from the 3rd paragraph, which I suspected would be least relevant to this question stem. The 3rd paragraph begins by establishing that these muralists "shared a common interest in rediscovering their Mexican national identity" and then continues to mention them borrowing from pre-Columbian culture and from Italian Renaissance. In a broader sense, the 2nd paragraph says that these muralists were aware of innovations in the "art world" and incorporated them into their murals. Presumably the "art world" includes more cultures than just Mexico's.

    Skill tested: Non-Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Out of Scope: elitist art form1% picked this

    Traditional easel painting is an elitist

    Easel painting is barely mentioned in the passage (beginning of 4th paragraph), and it's brought up fleetingly to mention that these artists had to stretch their concept from the easels they were used to, to the vast size of murals. Nothing in this area says anything about traditional painting being elitist.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free