Reading Comprehension

PT115 · S3 · P1 · Q4 Mexican Muralist Painters

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

The contemporary Mexican artistic movement known as muralism, a movement of public art that began with images painted on walls in an effort to represent Mexican national culture, is closely linked ideologically with its main sponsor, the new Mexican government elected in 1920 following the Mexican Revolution.

Topic

Contemporary Mexican muralism

Framework

Highlight Something Noteworthy

Main Point

Muralism was started by the government, but led by artists who had their own style, innovated based on the demands of murals, and endeavored to combine familiar images with historic context.

Summary

P1 - Origins/Aims of Muralism

We learn that new government in 1920 started the muralism movement, but we get an Author's Pivot halfway through (But). She wants us to know that the artists were the ones driving this bus. These last two sentences of the first paragraph might be our best place to look if we're doing Main Point, since they seem to summarize the "essence" of what this movement was about (those are the sort of lines that count as the Big Idea in most Highlight Something Noteworthy passages).

P2 - Not just political art, but also innovative art

This paragraph begins with another Author's pivot (But). The author wants us to know that we should not think that just because this movement was spurned by the government that this is formulaic, official government art. Yes, it captures the zeitgeist of the Mexican Revolution, but it also captures some innovations in the art world, which allowed the muralists to be realistic but also expressively free.

P3 - Developed distinct styles

This paragraph opens with another Clarify Misconception sentence -- . We then just get three examples of artists who each had a distinct style.

P4 - Murals make you innovate

This paragraph opens with a causal relationship between innovation and the demands of painting murals. The paragraph goes on to discuss some of the particular challenges of making a mural (as compared with some other form of painting).

4.

Based on the passage, with which one of the following statements about art would the muralists be most likely to agree?

  1. Art should be evaluated on

    Too Strong

    The muralists cared about all three of these things. They expressed populist and nationalist ideas, incorporated stylistic innovations, and were very mindful of the form of the mural medium. Their credo is that "art should incorporate images and familiar ideas as it comments upon the historic period in which it was created", so the content of their art was front and center in their mission.

    17% picked this

  2. Government sponsorship is essential to

    Too Strong: essential

    Although the government did sponsor muralism, we can't point to anywhere in the text where these muralists are indicating that such sponsorship was essential to the flourishing of art. The passage suggests that even though the government was the catalyst for this movement, the artists were the ones deciding on the content and style.

    2% picked this

  3. Realism is unsuited to large-scale

    Contradicted, if anything

    The end of the 2nd paragraph says that muralists "often used a realist style", so clearly those muralists thought that realism was suitable to large-scale public art.

    2% picked this

  4. Correct

    The use of techniques borrowed

    Why this is right

    This is worth digging into because of the lovably weak strength of language is so weak: "this thing can contribute to that thing". Ironically, the support for it comes mainly from the 3rd paragraph, which I suspected would be least relevant to this question stem. The 3rd paragraph begins by establishing that these muralists "shared a common interest in rediscovering their Mexican national identity" and then continues to mention them borrowing from pre-Columbian culture and from Italian Renaissance. In a broader sense, the 2nd paragraph says that these muralists were aware of innovations in the "art world" and incorporated them into their murals. Presumably the "art world" includes more cultures than just Mexico's.

    Skill tested: Non-Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    79% picked this

  5. Traditional easel painting is an

    Out of Scope: elitist art form

    Easel painting is barely mentioned in the passage (beginning of 4th paragraph), and it's brought up fleetingly to mention that these artists had to stretch their concept from the easels they were used to, to the vast size of murals. Nothing in this area says anything about traditional painting being elitist.

    1% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free