Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT114 S4 Q16 Explanation

People who do not believe

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsSufficient Assumption

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

People who do not believe that others distrust them are confident in their own abilities, so people who tend to trust others think of a difficult task as a challenge rather than a threat, since this confident in their own abilities regard such tasks.

What this question is testing

Sufficient Assumption

Your task

Find the assumption that, if added, guarantees the conclusion follows.

Common trap

Answers that only partly bridge the gap, leaving the conclusion unproven.

Winning move

Identify the new term in the conclusion and pick the choice that links it to the evidence.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
16.

The conclusion above follows logically if which one of the following

Answer choices

  1. Half Wrong4% picked this

    People who believe that others distrust them tend to

    We were looking for this: tend to ? think others don't trust others distrust you This answer is almost the contrapositive, but the 2nd idea still says "tend to trust others", and we would want it to say "do not tend to trust other" This answer: think others ? tend to distrust you trust others

  2. Unrelated to Goal24% picked this

    Confidence in one’s own abilities gives one confidence in the trustworthiness

    This doesn't look like the missing link we want: tend to trust others ? think others don't distrust you This answer provides this: confident in ---------> confident in own abilities trust of others Our premises gave us this: think others confident think hard task don't ? in own ? challenge distrust you abilities not threat Can we combine those to derive this? tend to think hard task trust -------------------------------> challenge others not threat Of course not. And the easiest way to see this from a bird's eye view is that we will don't have any rule that sounds like tend to trust ? [something] others Since the evidence never gave us a piece like that, if an answer choice doesn't give us that piece, we'll never be able to build the Conclusion's logic path.

  3. Correct61% picked this

    People who tend to trust others do not believe that others

    Why this is right

    This is exactly what we were looking for: tend to think others trust ? don't others distrust you We're trying to build this logic path in order to prove the Conclusion: tend to think hard task trust -------------------------------> challenge others not threat This answer choice gives us this tend don't think to trust ? others others distrust you The evidence gave us this don't think confident think hard task others ? in own ? challenge distrust you abilities not threat The answer snaps onto the evidence to create the logic path of the Conclusion.

    Skill tested: Sufficient Assumption · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Unrelated to Goal8% picked this

    People who are not threatened by difficult tasks tend to find

    If an answer choice isn't talking about "people who tend to trust others", then it's worthless to us. The evidence didn't tell us anything about those types of people, so if this answer choice also doesn't tell us anything about them, then there's no way to derive a conclusion about them.

  5. Unrelated to Goal3% picked this

    People tend to distrust those who they believe

    If an answer choice isn't talking about "people who tend to trust others", then it's worthless to us. The evidence didn't tell us anything about those types of people, so if this answer choice also doesn't tell us anything about them, then there's no way to derive a conclusion about them.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free