Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT113 S3 Q10 Explanation

If something would have been justifiably

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsSufficient Assumption

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

If something would have been justifiably regretted if it had occurred, then it is something that one should not have desired in the first place. It follows that many been desired in the first place.

What this question is testing

Sufficient Assumption

Your task

Find the assumption that, if added, guarantees the conclusion follows.

Common trap

Answers that only partly bridge the gap, leaving the conclusion unproven.

Winning move

Identify the new term in the conclusion and pick the choice that links it to the evidence.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
10.

The conclusion above follows logically if which one of the following

Answer choices

  1. Opposite, if anything1% picked this

    One should never regret one’s

    We're looking to hear that "many forgone pleasures would have been justifiably regretted if they had occurred". This answer is talking about not regretting pleasures, so it's headed in the wrong direction.

  2. Opposite, if anything13% picked this

    Forgone pleasures that were not desired would not have been

    We're looking to hear that "many forgone pleasures would have been justifiably regretted if they had occurred". This is talking about stuff that "would not have been justifiably regretted", so it's headed in the wrong direction.

  3. Opposite, if anything7% picked this

    Everything that one desires and then regrets not having is a

    We're looking to hear that "many forgone pleasures would have been justifiably regretted if they had occurred". In other words, if we had actually obtained that pleasure we desired, we would have justifiably regretted it. This answer is talking about regretting that we didn't obtain a pleasure we desired.

  4. Correct76% picked this

    Many forgone pleasures would have been

    Why this is right

    This answer Many FP's would have been JR combined with the premise If something would have been JR, shouldn't have been desired in the first place allows us to derive the conclusion Many FP's shouldn't have been desired in the first place.

    Skill tested: Sufficient Assumption · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Unrelated to Goal2% picked this

    Nothing that one should not have desired in the first place fails to

    If an answer isn't talking about "forgone pleasures", we're not interested. Our job here is to mathematically prove a claim about "forgone pleasures", and the evidence never mentioned "forgone pleasures", so the correct answer has to. If we combined this answer everything that shouldn't have been desired in the first place is a pleasure with the premise if something would have been justifiably regretted, it shouldn't have been been desired in the first place we would have no chance of deriving this conclusion many forgone pleasures shouldn't have been desired in first place because we never said "many forgone pleasures" in the supporting ideas.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free