Logical Reasoning

PT112 · S4 · Q22 In a recent study, a group of subjects

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

In a recent study, a group of subjects had their normal daily caloric intake increased by 25 percent.

Information

Group A had their normal daily caloric intake increased by 25%, entirely in the form of alcohol.

Group B had alcohol replace 25% of their normal daily caloric intake.

All subjects gained body fat, and the amount of body fat gained was the same for both groups.

Evaluate

On Inference questions we're trying to figure out whether a given question is testing us on Conditional, Causal, Mathematical, or Comparison based thinking.

This one seems to be testing Causality / Math / Comparisons.

Let's consider some numbers, to help us with the math. We'll say that the average daily caloric intake for all subjects was 1000 calories per day (yes, that's low, but let's keep the math easy).

Group A: 1000 calories of normal diet + 250 calories of alcohol Group B: 750 calories of normal diet + 250 calories of alcohol

They all gained the same amount of body fat. That's pretty surprising since Group A was eating 1250 calories a day and Group B was eating 1000 calories a day.

It looks like the 250 calories of alcohol caused the same gain in body fat, regardless of whether the rest of the diet was 1000 or 750 calories.

Goal

It's pretty hard to guess how to turn this into a correct answer choice, but let's expect something causal/math-y relating to this idea that the 250 calories of alcohol seemed to cause the same amount of body fat, whether the rest of the diet was 1000 or 750 calories. (naturally, it won't use our made up numbers)

22.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?

  1. Alcohol is metabolized more quickly

    Out of Scope: metabolized

    Nothing in this paragraph is saying anything relating to rate of metabolism (the speed at which something is digested / broken down into the bloodstream). We can only talk about the relationship between alcohol / fat / calories.

    2% picked this

  2. In the general population, alcohol

    Too Strong: primary

    We only received information about subjects within a study. This wouldn't permit us to support a claim about the #1 cause of gains of body fat in the general population. If we read about a psychological experiment where psychologists showed people horrifying pictures and made them cry, would we suddenly claim, "In the general population, being showed terrible pictures by psychologists is the primary cause of why people cry"? Of course not.

    2% picked this

  3. An increased amount of body

    Out of Scope: weight gain

    This is an attractively weak claim, but we don't have any information about whether any of these subjects gained weight during the experiment. Presumably, they DID! It's hard to gain body fat without gaining weight. There might be situations where muscle is converted into fat, but the person's weight stays the same or even drops, but we sure didn't hear about anything like that here.

    5% picked this

  4. Correct

    Body fat gain is not

    Why this is right

    This is also attractively weak. Saying that "X is not dependent solely on Y" is saying "something besides Y can affect X". In this case, Group B is proof that you can gain body fat, even though you never changed the number of calories you consumed. Group B continued to eat 1000 calories a day. They just swapped out 250 calories of nonalcoholic foods for 250 calories of alcohol. Since they still gained weight, we can say, "Body intake is not dependent solely on number of calories consumed. The TYPE of calories can also matter. Calories from alcohol affect body fat differently than nonalcoholic calories."

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    75% picked this

  5. The proportion of calories from

    Contradicted

    In Group A, 250 of their 1250 calories were from alcohol, so 1/5 (20%) was the proportion of calories from alcohol in their diet. In Group B, 250 of their 1000 calories were from alcohol, so 1/4 (25%) was the proportion of calories from alcohol in their diet. Both groups had equal fat gain. So the proportion of calories from alcohol seemed to mean nothing.

    16% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free