Logical Reasoning

PT112 · S4 · Q21 Tina: For centuries oceans and

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Start practicing free

Tina: For centuries oceans and human eccentricity have been linked in the literary and artistic imagination.

Tina's Claims

1. For centuries oceans and human eccentricity have been linked in the literary / artistic imagination.

2. The link between oceans and human eccentricity probably came from when Europeans used ships as asylums for unwatned weirdos during the Renaissance.

Sergio's Responses

1. AGREES + DISAGREES. Sergio would definitely agree that oceans and human eccentricity have been linked for centuries, but he'd disagree that it's only been for centuries. He's saying that oceans have always been linked to eccentricity.

2. DISAGREES. Sergio wouldn't agree that the link between oceans and human eccentricity began with the Renaissance practice of putting weirdos out to sea. He thinks that oceans and eccentricity have always been linked. It didn't start in the Renaissance.

Goal

Since Sergio seems to be disagreeing with Tina's explicit ideas, we have enough of a prephrase to head to the answers.

We're arguing over whether oceans / eccentricity have been linked since the Renaissance (because they put weirdos out to sea), or whether oceans / eccentricity have always been linked.

21.

Tina's and Sergio's statements lend the most support to the claim that they disagree about which one of the following statements?

  1. Eccentric humans were considered socially

    Nobody Disagrees

    It does seem like Tina is assuming that the socially undesirable people put out to sea on ships would be examples of human eccentricity. But we wouldn't be able to derive from Sergio's comments that he thinks, "Eccentric humans weren't considered socially undesirable during the Renaissance."

    2% picked this

  2. Oceans have always been viewed

    Nobody Disagrees

    Clearly Sergio believes this since he explicitly said it. Can we derive from Tina's paragraph that "oceans have not always been viewed as mysterious and unpredictable"? Not really. She doesn't think that oceans and human eccentricity have always been linked, but she could still believe that oceans were always thought of as mysterious and unpredictable.

    9% picked this

  3. The linkage between oceans and

    Nobody Agrees (reverse causality)

    Tina was saying that the Renaissance custom of using ships as asylums explains the linkage between oceans and eccentricity. Nobody was saying that the link between oceans and eccentricity explains the custom of using ships as asylums.

    13% picked this

  4. People have never attributed the

    Nobody Agrees / Too Strong (never)

    Seemingly both speakers are saying that people have at some point attributed the same qualities to oceans and eccentrics. Sergio thinks it's always been the case and Tina thinks it's been the case since the Renaissance. No one is saying it's never been the case.

    4% picked this

  5. Correct

    The linkage between oceans and

    Why this is right

    Sergio agrees with this claim, because he thinks that humans have always linked oceans and eccentricity. Tina disagrees with this claim, because she thinks the linkage is due to the Renaissance custom of using ships as asylums.

    Skill tested: Agree/Disagree · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    73% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill
LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free