Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT112 S3 Q18 Explanation

It is said that people should

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsNecessary Assumption

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

It is said that people should accept themselves as they are instead of being dissatisfied with their own abilities. But this is clearly a bad principle if the goal is a society whose citizens are genuinely happy, for no one can be genuinely happy if he is unwilling to undergo personal change of any kind.

What this question is testing

Necessary Assumption

Your task

Find the assumption the argument requires in order for its conclusion to hold.

Common trap

Answers that would help the argument but aren't strictly required (sufficient, not necessary).

Winning move

Negate each choice — the right one breaks the argument when negated.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
18.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong: probably16% picked this

    Those who are willing to change will probably find

    The author believes that a willingness to change is somewhat connected to being genuinely happy. But she never goes as far as saying that being wiling to change gives you better than 50% odds at finding genuine happiness. Willing to change is necessary, not likely sufficient.

  2. Correct62% picked this

    People who are not dissatisfied with themselves are less likely than others to

    Why this is right

    This is one of the links we predicted. Our author thinks that if we follow this "bad principle", which tells us not to be dissatisfied with ourselves, we'll mess up our chance at genuine happiness, which relies on pursuing personal excellence and being willing to undergo personal change. If people who were not dissatisfied with themselves were just as likely to pursue personal excellence, it would weaken the argument by making it seem like following this principle isn't affecting their ability to be genuinely happy.

    Skill tested: Necessary Assumption · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Too Strong11% picked this

    Personal excellence cannot be acquired by those who lack genuine confidence in

    Too Strong: cannot Out of Scope: genuine confidence The author thinks that genuine happiness is connected to the pursuit of personal excellence. She never talks about whether people achieve personal excellence, and there's no talk about having or lacking genuine confidence in your abilities (as opposed to fake confidence). Finally, this seems to be a little bit opposite of the author's thinking. She would rather that we live by the principle of not accepting ourselves (of lacking genuine confidence) because she's thinking this will more likely lead to us pursuing personal excellence / undergoing personal change.

  4. Out of Scope: justified / content9% picked this

    People are justified in feeling content with themselves when they have achieved some degree

    The author is never talking about when people are justified in feeling content with themselves. Also, she seems to think that people will be happier if they are continually pursuing personal excellence, not accepting themselves as is. So it would sound kind of unlike our author to say, "As soon as you have any degree of excellence, you should feel content with yourself".

  5. Out of Scope: painful to obtain2% picked this

    Happiness is not genuine unless it is based on something that is

    The ending of this really comes out of nowhere. Since this is a conditional answer, we can ask ourselves whether the author ever made the move it's describing: If happiness isn't based on something painful to obtain, then it's not genuine happiness. The author never talked about that. The author just said, If you're not pursuing personal excellence and not willing to undergo personal change, then you won't have genuine happiness.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free