Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT112 S3 Q10 Explanation

Peter: Because the leaves of

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMethod

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Peter: Because the leaves of mildly drought-stressed plants are tougher in texture than the leaves of abundantly watered plants, insects prefer to feed on the leaves of abundantly watered plants. Therefore, to minimize crop damage, farmers should water crops only just enough to ensure that there is to either the growth or the yield of the crops.

Jennifer: Indeed. In fact, a mildly drought-stressed plant will divert a small amount of its resources from normal growth to the development of watered plants will not.

What this question is testing

Method

Your task

Describe how the argument proceeds — the technique it uses to reach its conclusion.

Common trap

Answers that describe a method the argument doesn't actually use.

Winning move

Track the role each statement plays, then match that to the choice describing the same moves.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
10.

Jennifer’s comment is related to Peter’s argument in which one of the

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong: each8% picked this

    It offers information that supports each of the claims that Peter makes

    Too Strong: each

  2. Trap4% picked this

    It supports Peter’s argument by supplying a premise without which Peter’s conclusion cannot

    Too Strong: w/o which can't be drawn

  3. Too Strong: all4% picked this

    It supports Peter’s argument by offering an explanation of all of

    Too Strong: all

  4. Opposite: undermines P's conclusion7% picked this

    It supports one of Peter’s premises although it undermines

    Opposite: undermines P's conclusion

  5. Correct76% picked this

    It supports the conclusion of Peter’s argument by offering independent grounds

    Why this is right

    Answer E is correct.

    Skill tested: Method · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free