Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT112 S2 P1 Q1 Explanation

Computer Conferences

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsMain PointSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Traditionally, members of a community such as a town or neighborhood share a common location and a sense of necessary interdependence that includes, for example, mutual respect and emotional support. But as modern societies grow more technological and sometimes more alienating, people tend to spend less time in the kinds of interactions to those comments they read, function as communities that can substitute for traditional interactions with neighbors.

What are the characteristics that advocates claim allow computer conferences to function as communities? For one, participants often share common interests or concerns; conferences are frequently organized around specific topics such as music or parenting. Second, because these conferences are conversations, participants have adopted certain conventions in recognition of the importance of advice and support during personal crises such as illness or the loss of a loved one.

But while it is true that conferences can be both respectful and supportive, they nonetheless fall short of communities. For example, conferences discriminate along educational and economic lines because participation requires a basic knowledge of computers and the ability to afford access to conferences. Further, while advocates claim that a shared interest if conference participants cut themselves off further from valuable interactions in their own towns or neighborhoods.

What this question is testing

Main Point

Your task

Capture the passage's overall primary point — the claim everything else supports.

Common trap

Answers that are true but too narrow (a single paragraph) or too broad (beyond the passage's scope).

Winning move

Summarize the whole passage in one sentence first, then match it to a choice.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
1.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the central idea of

Answer choices

  1. Opposite2% picked this

    Because computer conferences attract participants who share common interests and rely on a number of mutually acceptable conventions for communicating with one another, such

    The main clause of this answer reads, [Computer] conferences can substitute effectively for certain interactions .. within actual communities. We were looking for the main clause to be the opposite of that, "Computer conferences fall short of being effective substitutes for community."

  2. Wrong Emphasis: wrong central topic0% picked this

    Since increased participation in computer conferences threatens to replace actual communities, members of actual communities are returning to the traditional interactions

    The main clause of this answer says, Members of actual communities are returning to traditional interactions. We were looking for, Computer conferences fall short of being a true community. This main clause isn't similar at all to what we were looking for. It's on a completely different topic from "computer conferences".

  3. Too Narrow Contradicted3% picked this

    Because participants in computer conferences are geographically separated and communicate only by typing, their interactions cannot be as mutually respectful and supportive as are

    The main clause of this is saying, The interactions [of people in computer conferences] can't be as respectful and supportive as were traditional interactions within actual communities. We were looking for, Computer conferences fall short of being true communities. This answer would be giving us a premise that supports the conclusion we're looking for. Why do computer conferences fall short of being true communities? One reason is [this answer choice], that participants aren't as respectful and supportive as actual community members historically have been. Since we're looking for the Main Point of the passage, we need the Conclusion not part of the supporting evidence. But in this case this Premise is also contradicted by the first sentence of the final paragraph, in which the author makes it seem like the positive traits that computer conferences do have are being supportive and being respectful of each other.

  4. Correct86% picked this

    Although computer conferences offer some of the same benefits that actual communities do, the significant lack of diversity among conference participants makes

    Why this is right

    The main clause here is that, the lack of diversity among participants in a computer conference makes it so that computer conferences are not like actual communities. We finally found the clause we were looking for! They hid it at the end of the main clause, after an introductory modifier. Can we sign off on the rest of the details? Did the author say that computer conferences offer some of the same benefits that actual communities do? Yes, in our Most Valuable Sentence (the first sentence of the final paragraph), the author concedes some benefits of computer conferences (they can be respectful and supportive). Did the author cite 'lack of diversity' as the primary reason for why computer conferences fall short of being a real community? Sure. Immediately after claiming that these conferences fall short of being real communities, she talks about how they discriminate along educational and economic lines. She also says in the middle of the last paragraph that computer conferences "are a self-selecting group. Actual communities, on the other hand, are nonintentional."

    Skill tested: Main Point · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Too Strong: still won't be acceptable9% picked this

    Even if access to computer technology is broad enough to attract a more diverse group of people to participate in computer conferences, such conferences

    This main clause is very temptingly similar to what we were looking for: Computer conferences will not be acceptable substitutes for actual communities. However, the tense is different. Our Most Valuable Sentence (start of 3rd paragraph) is saying that "these conferences fall short", not "these conferences will fall short". The main point is about what's currently happening, not about some hypothetical world in which computer conferences are more diverse. The choice that (D) vs. (E) offers us is this: Because they lack diversity, computer conferences aren't an acceptable substitute for an actual community. vs. Even if they one day attain diversity, computer conferences still won't be an acceptable substitute for an actual community.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free