Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT111 S1 Q25 Explanation

A company that produces men’s cologne

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsParadox

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

A company that produces men’s cologne had been advertising the product in general-circulation magazines for several years. Then one year the company decided to advertise its cologne exclusively in those sports magazines with a predominantly male readership. That year the company sold in any of the three immediately preceding years.

What this question is testing

Paradox

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
25.

Which one of the following, if true, best helps to explain why the sale of the company’s cologne

Answer choices

  1. No Distinction3% picked this

    Television advertising reaches more people than does magazine advertising, but the company never advertised its cologne on television

    This has nothing to do with the company's before/after. They didn't advertise on TV before, and they don't advertise on TV now, so this answer doesn't offer us any changing condition that could explain why they are now selling fewer bottles of cologne.

  2. Unclear Impact6% picked this

    The general-circulation magazines in which the company had placed its advertisements experienced a large rise

    If the rise in circulation (more readers) happened after the cologne company made the switch, then this answer has no impact on our situation. If the rise in circulation happened while the cologne company was still advertising in this general-circulation magazine, then we might be able to say, "the previous few years they sold more bottles of cologne because the magazines they were advertising in were seeing a spike in readers". But we still have a hard time with that story line. After all, just because the general-circulation magazine has an uptick in readers doesn't mean that they have more readers than the sports magazines do. We can only explain "selling fewer bottles now that we advertise in sports magazines" using this storyline if we know that the sports magazines have fewer readers. However, we have no way to compare the circulation size of the general magazines to that of the sports magazines.

  3. No Distinction5% picked this

    Most men do not wear cologne on a

    This has nothing to do with the company's before/after. Most men didn't wear cologne on a regular basis before, and most men don't regularly wear it now. Since this answer doesn't offer us any changing condition that could explain why they are now selling fewer bottles of cologne, it's useless.

  4. Correct85% picked this

    Women often buy cologne as gifts for male friends

    Why this is right

    This represents a change from before to after. Before, when they advertised in general-circulation magazines, the ads were seen by more women. And since women often buy men's cologne as gifts for males, these women were seeing the ads and buying that cologne. Now, they advertise in magazines that are primarily read by men. Since females no longer see the ads, females no longer buy the cologne, and thus we have a story for why switching to a mainly-male magazine resulted in fewer bottles of cologne being sold.

    Skill tested: Paradox · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Deepens Paradox, if anything1% picked this

    Successful advertisements for men’s cologne often feature

    While we have no idea whether this company's cologne ads involve any well-known athletes (so this answer has Unclear Impact), this answer drifts in the direction of thinking, "Okay, now they're advertising in a sports magazines, so they're probably more likely to include well-known athletes in the ads, and since doing so is often associated with a successful advertisement, we should be expecting them to be selling more bottles of cologne."

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free