Reading Comprehension

PT110 · S4 · P4 · Q23 African American Rice Cultivation

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

While historians once propagated the myth that Africans who were brought to the New World as slaves contributed little of value but their labor, a recent study by Amelia Wallace Vernon helps to dispel this notion by showing that Africans introduced rice and the methods of cultivating it into what is now the United States in the early eighteenth century.

Topic

The introduction of rice cultivation to the United States by Africans and the cultural and historical significance of African American rice farming.

Framework

Old / New, Highlight Noteworthy

Main Point

Recent research overturns the long-standing myth that Africans brought as slaves contributed little besides labor, showing that they introduced rice and rice cultivation techniques to the U.S., and that rice farming continued for complex cultural and symbolic reasons even after slavery ended. ( — first sentence)

P1: Dispelling the Myth – Africans Introduced Rice Cultivation

A new study by Amelia Wallace Vernon directly contradicts the old idea that African slaves only contributed labor, showing instead that they brought both rice and rice farming know-how to early America. She uses historical documents, such as a 1718 order for Africans who could cultivate rice, to support her claims, which overturn earlier attributions of rice introduction to French settlers.

P2: Why Did African Americans Grow Rice?

Vernon’s research looks into why African Americans continued to grow rice, even though the economy was focused on cotton. She finds that during slavery, plantation owners let or made slaves grow rice on unsuitable cotton land for their own consumption, and that rice farming let slaves work independently, away from supervision.

P3: Rice Cultivation After Slavery – A Puzzle

After emancipation, it became even less practical for Black farmers to grow rice—corn was more popular to eat, there was no market, and landlords accepted only cotton for rent. The effort needed to make land suitable for rice seemed to outweigh any reward, unless the act of transforming the land itself had significance.

23.

Which one of the following most completely and accurately describes the author's attitude toward Vernon's study?

  1. respectful of its author and

    Unsupported: skeptical

    There aren't any lines in the passage that support our author being skeptical. She seems either neutral or mildly approving of the ideas presented.

    2% picked this

  2. Correct

    admiring of its accomplishments and

    Why this is right

    We get "admiring" from the first paragraph (helps to dispel the myth / compelling discoveries). We get generally receptive from the absence of any pushback to the ideas stated in the last paragraph. If authors present someone's ideas without offering their own qualms or concerns, then LSAT considers those authors to be implicitly sympathetic to those ideas (the ideas are worthy of consideration).

    Skill tested: Author's Attitude · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    81% picked this

  3. appreciative of the effort it

    Weaker Match

    This would be acceptable as an answer, I suppose, if we didn't have a better match. Our author is definitely appreciative of Vernon, but for helping to dispel a myth and for presenting compelling discoveries. There aren't any attitude moments attached to "the effort it required" to conduct this study. In fact, we're told at the beginning of the 2nd paragraph that part of the methodology of this study was "interviewing elderly African Americans". It would be weird to say, "Vernon, thank you for your study. I know it required a lot of effort to interview those elderly African Americans." When we say, "I appreciate the effort", it means something pretty generic. I appreciate the finished product. But saying "I appreciate the effort it required" is more saying, I appreciate how hard that finished product was to produce. And the second half of this answer is also a weak match. It's hard to say the author is totally neutral when she says in the first paragraph, "She [Vernon] proposes two intriguing answers".

    16% picked this

  4. enthusiastic about its goals but

    Unsupported: skeptical

    There aren't any lines in the passage that support our author being skeptical. She seems either neutral or mildly approving of the ideas presented. Calling the theories (i.e. the answers to the question of why African Americans grew rice) "intriguing answers" sounds like counter-support for being skeptical of Vernon's theories.

    1% picked this

  5. accepting of its author’s motives

    Too Strong: overtly dismissive Opposite

    Our author is moderately positive toward Vernon, not overtly dismissive.

    0% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free