Logical Reasoning

PT110 · S2 · Q18 Editorialist: The positions advanced by

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Editorialist: The positions advanced by radical environmentalists often contain hypotheses that are false and proposals that are economically infeasible.

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

18.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the editorialist's argument?

  1. The little progress that has

    Trap

    5% picked this

  2. Correct

    Radical environmentalists, by promoting their

    Why this is right

    Answer B is correct.

    Skill tested: Main Conclusion · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    73% picked this

  3. Social and political inertia is

    Trap

    7% picked this

  4. Radical environmentalists often put forth

    Trap

    12% picked this

  5. Radical environmentalists advocate positions without

    Trap

    3% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free