Reading Comprehension

PT110 · S1 · P3 · Q13 Lamarck’s Theory

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

In the eighteenth century the French naturalist Jean Baptiste de Lamarck believed that an animal’s use or disuse of an organ affected that organ’s development in the animal’s offspring.

Topic

The inheritance of acquired characteristics—how some traits gained during life can actually be passed to offspring, possibly supporting Lamarck’s old theory.

Framework

Old / New

Main Point

Recent research has uncovered ways in which acquired characteristics can be inherited—contrary to previous belief—and this may vindicate Lamarck’s idea that traits acquired during an organism’s lifetime can be passed to offspring. The Most Valuable Sentence is at the end of the last paragraph:

P1: Introduction—Lamarck’s Idea and Its Dismissal

We’re introduced to Lamarck’s old theory: that traits acquired during life (like a giraffe’s long neck) are inherited by offspring. For a long time, scientists dismissed this idea, but new evidence suggests it might occur after all.

P2: Example—Environmentally Induced Traits in Bacteria

Scientists discovered that bacteria can inherit the loss of a cell wall due to changes in how genes interact (not changes to the genes themselves), showing a form of inheriting acquired characteristics.

P3: Example—Genes Added or Removed by the Environment

There are other ways acquired traits can be inherited: viruses can introduce genes to fruit flies, or genetic material (plasmids) can pass from one bacterium to another, giving new abilities quickly—suggesting this process may have sped up evolution.

13.

The passage suggests that many biologists no longer believe which one of the following?

  1. An organ’s use or disuse

    Opposite

    This idea comes from Lamarck, in the first sentence. For many years, biologists rejected this idea. By the end of this passage, we're saying "this new research ... may eventually prove Lamarck's hypothesis to be correct". This is an idea that biologists used to reject, but are starting to accept. But the question stem wants something biologists used to accept but are now starting to reject.

    23% picked this

  2. Some but not all genes

    Opposite

    This is something biologists used to reject and are starting to believe. We might have to remind ourselves what it means to inherit horizontally vs. inherit vertically. Vertical - comes from ancestors Horizontal - acquired from environmental agents Biologists used to think that all genes were inherited vertically, but new research has taught them that some genes are acquired horizontally. So this answer reflects something they currently believe, not something they used to believe but have since rejected.

    9% picked this

  3. All genes are inherited horizontally.

    Opposite, if anything

    This answer is saying that biologists used to think that all genes were acquired from environmental agents like viruses, plasmids, and bacteria, but they no longer believe that. That's crazy talk. Biologists only recently found out that some genes are acquired from environmental agents like viruses, plasmids, and bacteria. They don't currently believe that all genes are horizontal, but they now recognize that some are.

    4% picked this

  4. Some but not all genes

    Contradicted

    Biologists currently believe this, as evidenced by the first sentence of the final paragraph. According to the new evidence, most genes are inherited vertically but some are inherited horizontally. If biologists no longer believed this answer choice, that would mean that they no believe either that "all genes are inherited vertically" or that "zero genes are inherited vertically", neither of which matches their current beliefs.

    5% picked this

  5. Correct

    All genes are inherited vertically.

    Why this is right

    Biologists used to, but no longer believe, that an organism could never inherit a trait their parent acquired during its life. They believed that the offspring only inherited the genetic code the parent was born with. If something changed the parents genes (a horizontal change like a virus or bacteria), that change couldn't be inherited by the offspring. But now they see examples of an acquired trait being passed down. The beginning of the last paragraph says, The new evidence suggests that ... most genes are inherited "vertically", but some, however, seem to have been acquired "horizontally". And the final sentence of the passage says, Some horizontal transmission may well be the mechanism for inheritance of acquired characteristics that has long eluded biologists. Biologists long believed that there was no way to inherit acquired characteristics, but now that they are aware of the mechanism of horizontal transmission of genes, they are reconsidering. Thus, they no longer believe that all genes are transmitted vertically. In framework language, if we were using Old / New, then we would have thought of vertical transmission as the Old idea and horizontal as the New idea.

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    60% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free