Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT109 S4 Q1 Explanation

Advertisement: Among popular automobiles, Sturdimades

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsFlaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Start practicing free

Free to start

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Advertisement: Among popular automobiles, Sturdimades stand apart. Around the world, hundreds of longtime Sturdimade owners have signed up for Sturdimade’s “long distance” club, members of which must have a Sturdimade they have driven for a total of at least 100,000 miles or 160,000 kilometers. Some members boast of having driven their Sturdimades rely on being able to drive it for a very long distance.

What this question is testing

Flaw

Your task

Describe the reasoning error the argument actually commits.

Common trap

Answers that name a real logical flaw the argument doesn't actually make.

Winning move

Articulate the gap in the reasoning yourself, then match it to the choice that describes that gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
1.

Construed as an argument, the advertisement’s reasoning is most vulnerable to criticism on which one of

Answer choices

  1. Correct92% picked this

    It draws a general conclusion from cases selected only on the basis of having a characteristic

    Why this is right

    Answer A is correct.

    Skill tested: Flaw · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Trap2% picked this

    Its conclusion merely restates the evidence given to

  3. Trap2% picked this

    It fails to clarify in which of two possible ways an ambiguous term is being

  4. Trap0% picked this

    The evidence given to support the conclusion actually undermines

  5. Trap4% picked this

    It treats popular opinion as if it constituted conclusive evidence for

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill
LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free