Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT108 S4 P4 Q25 Explanation

Darwin/Taphonomy

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAnalogySociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Darwin's conception of early prehistoric humans as confident, clever hunter-gatherers has long dominated anthropology. His theory has been reinforced by an accident of history: the human fossil record has been found largely in reverse order. Remains of humans' most recent forebears, who lived 35,000 to 100,000 years ago, were discovered in 1856; in which their environments differ from prehistoric ones (for example, in containing fewer large animal predators).

Recent intellectual developments, such as the new field of taphonomy, have called into question the traditional hypothesis that early hominids outsmarted the predators with whom they competed for meat and that they mastered their world through hunting. Taphonomy investigates the transformation of skeletal remains into fossil—it asks, for example, whether bone piles whether hyenas' teeth scar animal bones differently than do human tools.

Taphonomy has been utilized by some researchers in studying a group of animal fossils, hominid fossils, and stone tools that were almost two million years old. By comparing the microscopic features of linear grooves on the fossilized animal bones with similar grooves on modern bones, the researchers found that cut marks made joints and that the toothmarks of animal carnivores often underlay rather than overlay the cut marks.

The researchers hypothesized from this evidence that early hominids were scavengers of meat left from carnivore kills, rather than hunters of live prey. From patterns of wear on fossilized hominid teeth, the researchers further deduced that early hominids, like other scavengers, ate fruit primarily and meat only occasionally. Early hominids could have hominids who often perched in trees and who foraged and scavenged alone or in small groups.

What this question is testing

Analogy

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
25.

Which one of the following situations is most analogous to the discovery of fossil hominids as described in

Answer choices

  1. Half Match15% picked this

    Traces of an ancient civilization are found, and scholars conclude that its people occupied the site for only a short period: however, further excavations

    This answer doesn't have anything about discovering stuff in reverse order, although it does talk about discovering stuff leading to a misconception. 1. discovered in reverse order (the earlier version were discovered later / the latest versions were discovered first) 2. led to a misconception that they were similar to modern-day examples

  2. Correct50% picked this

    Art historians who know the late paintings of an artist find similar paintings done by the artist a few years prior to the late

    Why this is right

    This answer does talk about discovering the later stuff first, the earlier stuff later. Does it say that discovering in reverse order led to a misconception? Not quite. That reverse discovery leads to an idea, but we don't know whether it's a misconception. And this idea is an inference about something further back in time, whereas the 1st paragraph's misconception went forward in time. But ... it's still an inference about the discovered stuff being similar to other examples of the stuff. So even though it doesn't perfectly match the second part, it does match some of it. 1. discovered in reverse order (the earlier version were discovered later / the latest versions were discovered first) 2. led to a misconception that they were similar to modern-day examples Also, if we were going to prioritize answers that match #1 vs. #2, we would prioritize matching #1. The question stem asks "what is analogous to the discovery", and #1 is specifically about discovering something in reverse order.

    Skill tested: Analogy · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Half Match11% picked this

    Two manuscripts written by an anonymous medieval author are discovered many years apart: when the second manuscript is found, historians realize that the manuscripts

    This answer doesn't have anything about discovering stuff in reverse order. It just says that they're discovered "many years apart". Like (A), this does lead to some misconception. 1. discovered in reverse order (the earlier version were discovered later / the latest versions were discovered first) 2. led to a misconception that they were similar to modern-day examples

  4. No Match19% picked this

    Pottery dating back thousands of years is found, and scholars determine that these pieces bear a striking resemblance to some made only

    This answer doesn't have anything about discovering stuff in reverse order, and it doesn't have anything about a discovery leading to a misconception.

  5. No Match6% picked this

    A fossil of an unknown prehistoric plant is discovered, and botanists seek to find in it characteristics that are similar to those seen in

    This answer doesn't have anything about discovering stuff in reverse order, and it doesn't have anything about a discovery leading to a misconception.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free