Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT108 S4 P4 Q24 Explanation

Darwin/Taphonomy

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsPrimary PurposeSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Darwin's conception of early prehistoric humans as confident, clever hunter-gatherers has long dominated anthropology. His theory has been reinforced by an accident of history: the human fossil record has been found largely in reverse order. Remains of humans' most recent forebears, who lived 35,000 to 100,000 years ago, were discovered in 1856; in which their environments differ from prehistoric ones (for example, in containing fewer large animal predators).

Recent intellectual developments, such as the new field of taphonomy, have called into question the traditional hypothesis that early hominids outsmarted the predators with whom they competed for meat and that they mastered their world through hunting. Taphonomy investigates the transformation of skeletal remains into fossil—it asks, for example, whether bone piles whether hyenas' teeth scar animal bones differently than do human tools.

Taphonomy has been utilized by some researchers in studying a group of animal fossils, hominid fossils, and stone tools that were almost two million years old. By comparing the microscopic features of linear grooves on the fossilized animal bones with similar grooves on modern bones, the researchers found that cut marks made joints and that the toothmarks of animal carnivores often underlay rather than overlay the cut marks.

The researchers hypothesized from this evidence that early hominids were scavengers of meat left from carnivore kills, rather than hunters of live prey. From patterns of wear on fossilized hominid teeth, the researchers further deduced that early hominids, like other scavengers, ate fruit primarily and meat only occasionally. Early hominids could have hominids who often perched in trees and who foraged and scavenged alone or in small groups.

What this question is testing

Primary Purpose

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
24.

The author cites the early hominid's "upright mode of walking" (fourth paragraph) primarily

Answer choices

  1. Unrelated to Goal2% picked this

    counter anthropologists' previous hypotheses about how early

    The purpose wasn't to fight anyone's hypothesis. It was to support the hypothesis that early hominids were probably scavengers.

  2. Correct90% picked this

    provide an example of how the hominids were suited to their method

    Why this is right

    This passage is suggesting that early hominids' method of gathering food was not primarily hunters of live prey. Instead, their method of gathering food was scavenging. Does this detail about "walking upright" provide an example of how these early hominids were suited to scavenging? Yes, it is presented as an illustration of the claim that "Early hominids could have been well adapted for scavenging".

    Skill tested: Primary Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Wrong Role2% picked this

    explain why early hominids subsisted on a diet that included more

    This targets a different idea from the paragraph, but not the one that "walking upright" is designed to illustrate. Again, the colon that comes after "early hominids could have been well adapted to scavenging" is telling us the author's rhetorical purpose in what comes after the colon. Everything after the colon in that sentence is an illustration of the claim that comes before the colon.

  4. Wrong Role2% picked this

    increase the reader's appreciation for the resemblance between early hominids and

    Haha, this is a charming speculation, but we have to support these answers by pointing to the framing idea that comes (almost always) right before the detail. Nothing in that last paragraph seems aimed at increasing our appreciation of early humans, and the passage overall is stressing that we were wrong to think of early humans as being similar to modern preindustrial humans.

  5. Out of Scope: competed in hunting4% picked this

    contrast early hominids and other mammals with whom they competed in

    This whole paragraph is about early humans scavenging, not hunting. We never compare early humans to other mammals who are hunting for live prey.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free