Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT107 S2 P2 Q15 Explanation

Traditional Languages

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsPrincipleSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Tribal communities in North America believe that their traditional languages are valuable resources that must be maintained. However, these traditional languages can fall into disuse when some of the effects of the majority culture on tribal life serve as barriers between a community and its traditional forms of social, economic, or spiritual serious and have taken action to prevent it, primarily through community self-teaching.

Before any community can systemically and formally teach a traditional language to its younger members, it must first document the language’s grammar; for example, a group of Northern Utes spent two years conducting a thorough analysis and classification of Northern Ute linguistic structures. The grammatical information is then arranged in sequence from in ways that will be most useful and appropriate to the culture.

Certain obstacles can stand in the way of developing these teaching methods. One is the difficulty a community may encounter when it attempts to write down elements (particularly the spellings of words) of a language that has been primarily oral for centuries, as is often the case with traditional languages. Sometimes this unique written equivalent—a desirable but ultimately frustrating condition that no written language has ever fully satisfied.

Another obstacle is dialect. There may be many language traditions in a particular community; which one is to be written down and taught? The Northern Utes decided not to standardize their language, agreeing that various phonetic spellings of words would be accepted as long as their meanings were clear. Although this troubled instruction in the Northern Ute language, even elementary school children could write and speak it effectively.

It has been argued that the attempt to write down traditional languages is misguided and unnecessary; after all, in many cases these languages have been transmitted in their oral form since their origins. Defenders of the practice counter that they are writing down their languages precisely because of a general decline in effort to eschew aspects of the majority culture that make this preservation difficult.

What this question is testing

Principle

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
15.

Based on the passage, which one of the following appears to be a principle guiding the actions of those attempting to

Answer choices

  1. Opposite, if anything4% picked this

    In writing down an oral language, one should always be concerned primarily with the degree of correspondence between

    This doesn't reinforce any of our Support Window from the 2nd paragraph. It sounds very extreme: we should always be primarily concerned with matching spoken sounds to written symbols. And it seems to go against the 3rd paragraph's ending, in which the author says that it's basically a hopeless pursuit to try to get every sound in the language to have a unique correspondence with written symbols.

  2. Correct80% picked this

    In deciding whether and how to standardize and teach a primarily oral language, one should always keep the needs of the

    Why this is right

    This answer also has the scary-strong "always", but a quick glance at the five answers reveals that all five of them use "always", so that can't really be the way we disqualify any of them. This at least reinforces part of our Support Window: 1. document grammar first 2. go from simpler to more complex 3. devise methods that are appropriate to the culture There is further reinforcement in the 4th paragraph, when we hear that the Northern Utes decided not to standardize their language: the lack of standard orthography made sense in the context of the community's needs

    Skill tested: Principle · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Out of Scope14% picked this

    In determining whether to preserve a language orally or preserve it in writing, one should always strive to ignore the influences of the majority

    Out of Scope: most effective Contradicted: ignore influence The final paragraph takes up the question of whether languages should be preserved in writing or continue only as an oral tradition. The final sentence is saying that they would ideally just keep it in oral form, but because majority culture has led to a general decline in oral traditions, they feel the need to commit to a written form out of necessity. If a community could eschew (avoid / reject) the aspects of majority culture that make oral preservation difficult, then they could continue to keep the language only in oral form. So the passage is sort of saying the opposite of "ignore the influence of the majority culture when you're making this decision". It is saying, "the decision is based on the influence of the majority culture. If majority culture is leading to a decline in oral traditions, you should write down the language. But if you can actively shield the community from aspects of the majority culture that are doing this, then you can continue to preserve the language in oral form."

  4. Contradicted1% picked this

    In considering how to present the grammar of a primarily oral language to students, one should always employ a sequence that

    This goes against the 2nd part of our Support Window 1. document grammar first 2. go from simpler to more complex 3. devise methods that are appropriate to the culture This is saying to tackle difficult concepts first.

  5. Contradicted1% picked this

    In adjudicating among variant spellings of words from different language traditions, one should always favor the spelling preferred by

    In the 4th paragraph, we hear that the Northern Utes decided not to standardize their language, "agreeing that various phonetic spellings would be accepted as long as their meanings were clear". This answer is saying that you shouldn't accept variant spellings. You should pick the one that the majority uses.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free