Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT107 S2 P2 Q14 Explanation

Traditional Languages

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAuthor's AttitudeSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Tribal communities in North America believe that their traditional languages are valuable resources that must be maintained. However, these traditional languages can fall into disuse when some of the effects of the majority culture on tribal life serve as barriers between a community and its traditional forms of social, economic, or spiritual serious and have taken action to prevent it, primarily through community self-teaching.

Before any community can systemically and formally teach a traditional language to its younger members, it must first document the language’s grammar; for example, a group of Northern Utes spent two years conducting a thorough analysis and classification of Northern Ute linguistic structures. The grammatical information is then arranged in sequence from in ways that will be most useful and appropriate to the culture.

Certain obstacles can stand in the way of developing these teaching methods. One is the difficulty a community may encounter when it attempts to write down elements (particularly the spellings of words) of a language that has been primarily oral for centuries, as is often the case with traditional languages. Sometimes this unique written equivalent—a desirable but ultimately frustrating condition that no written language has ever fully satisfied.

Another obstacle is dialect. There may be many language traditions in a particular community; which one is to be written down and taught? The Northern Utes decided not to standardize their language, agreeing that various phonetic spellings of words would be accepted as long as their meanings were clear. Although this troubled instruction in the Northern Ute language, even elementary school children could write and speak it effectively.

It has been argued that the attempt to write down traditional languages is misguided and unnecessary; after all, in many cases these languages have been transmitted in their oral form since their origins. Defenders of the practice counter that they are writing down their languages precisely because of a general decline in effort to eschew aspects of the majority culture that make this preservation difficult.

What this question is testing

Author's Attitude

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
14.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the author’s attitude toward the goal of having a written language exactly

Answer choices

  1. Correct59% picked this

    conviction that an exact match is all but impossible

    Why this is right

    This matches up decently with the end of the 3rd paragraph, where the author says that when you try to get every sound in the language to have a unique written equivalent, it is a "desirable but ultimately frustrating condition that no written language has ever fully satisfied". The language of "all but impossible" is very strong, but so is our support sentence, which says that no written language has ever been able to exactly match its oral equivalent.

    Skill tested: Author's Attitude · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Contradicted, if anything22% picked this

    doubt that an exact match is worthy of consideration even

    In that final sentence of the 3rd paragraph, the author acknowledges the appeal of wanting a written language to match up perfectly with its oral counterpart. She says it's "a desirable condition". So she seems to think that it's worth of consideration in principle. She just thinks it's a fool's errand, in practice.

  3. Out of Scope: exact match attainable17% picked this

    faith that an exact match is attainable if certain obstacles

    This sounds far too optimistic that we could ever have an exact match, given that the author says that "no written language has ever fully" been able to. accomplish an exact match.

  4. Opposite1% picked this

    confidence that an exact match can easily be accomplished in

    This is even more optimistic than (C), which was already too optimistic. The author tells us that no language has ever been able to fully satisfy an exact match, so where would her confidence come from that in most languages an exact match can easily be accomplished.

  5. Out of Scope: malign motives2% picked this

    suspicion that the motives behind the attempts to achieve the goal are

    Since the author acknowledges that having an exact match is a "desirable condition", it doesn't sound like she's suspicious of people who want an exact match. She seems to be saying, "I totally get your motives. Unfortunately, what you're asking for seems to be impossible since no written language has ever pulled it off".

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free