Reading Comprehension

PT106 · S4 · P1 · Q2 Native American Land Claims

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Some Native American tribes have had difficulty establishing their land claims because the United States government did not recognize their status as tribes; therefore during the 1970's some Native Americans attempted to obtain such recognition through the medium of U.S. courts.

Topic

Native American land claims and the challenges posed by cultural differences in legal discourse.

Framework

Problem / Solution

Main Point

Native American tribes, such as the Mashpee Wampanoag, have faced significant obstacles in asserting land rights through U.S. courts because of conflicting cultural definitions and expectations, particularly the courts’ preference for written documentation over oral testimony; however, courts are beginning to recognize the need to accommodate such cultural differences for fairer legal outcomes. The Most Valuable Sentence: The final sentence of the passage sums up the key idea:

P1: Intro to the Problem of Legal Recognition across Cultures

Some Native American tribes haven't had their land claims recognized by the U.S. government because their tribal status wasn't acknowledged. In the 1970s, Native Americans tried to gain recognition via the U.S. court system, but their arguments had to be framed in legal terms that didn't always match up with their own cultural perspectives.

P2: The Mashpee Wampanoag Case—Specific Example of the Problem

A notable example involved the Mashpee Wampanoag, whose legal case hinged on whether they qualified as a "tribe" as defined by previous court rulings. When non-Mashpee residents gained control of the town, Mashpee lands were sold off, leading to the Mashpee suing under a law protecting tribal land. The town countered by arguing the Mashpee didn’t meet the legal definition of a tribe, so the court required the Mashpee to prove they were a self-governing group with a defined territory.

P3: Cultural Clash and Its Consequences / Hints of Improvement

The town insisted the Mashpee show written proof of self-government and land ownership, while the Mashpee relied on oral testimony, in line with their traditions. The legal system dismissed the oral evidence, leading to the Mashpee’s defeat in court. However, there have been recent improvements: courts are beginning to realize that rigidly sticking to their own discourse can block fair decisions, and they are starting to better accommodate cultural differences.

2.

According to the passage, the Mashpee's lawsuit was based on their objection to

  1. the increase in the non-Mashpee

    Unrelated to Goal

    This doesn't talk about the purchasing of Mashpee land without federal approval, so it's not what we're looking for. The Mashpee were presumably unnerved by how non-Mashpee people were moving into town and gaining political power, but the Mashpee didn't bring a lawsuit to try to stop that (there's no law against moving into a town and gaining political power).

    1% picked this

  2. the repeal of a statute

    Out of Scope: repeal

    The statute forbidding land transfers without approval wasn't repealed. It was in effect, and the Mashpee alleged that the purchases of land by the non-Mashpee were in violation of that still-extant statute. The Mashpee's lawsuit was in objection to the perceived violation of that statute.

    9% picked this

  3. the loss of Mashpee control

    Wrong Timeframe: immediately after

    We're told that the area inhabited by the Mashpee had "long been occupied by the Mashpee, who continued to have control over land use after the town's incorporation". It wasn't until the 1960s's that the problem with the non-Mashpee occurred. And the problem wasn't that Mashpee "lost control over the land" (that's too broad and sweeping). It's that non-Mashpee were buying formerly Mashpee land without getting the required federal approval.

    4% picked this

  4. the town’s refusal to recognize

    Unrelated to Goal

    This doesn't talk about the purchasing of Mashpee land without federal approval, so it's not what we're looking for. Nothing in the lawsuit talks about a deed to the city going unrecognized.

    6% picked this

  5. Correct

    the sale of Mashpee-controlled land

    Why this is right

    We were looking for "the purchasing of Mashpee land without federal approval" and this is a great match.

    Skill tested: Locate Detail · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    80% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free