Reading Comprehension

PT106 · S4 · P1 · Q1 Native American Land Claims

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Some Native American tribes have had difficulty establishing their land claims because the United States government did not recognize their status as tribes; therefore during the 1970's some Native Americans attempted to obtain such recognition through the medium of U.S. courts.

Topic

Native American land claims and the challenges posed by cultural differences in legal discourse.

Framework

Problem / Solution

Main Point

Native American tribes, such as the Mashpee Wampanoag, have faced significant obstacles in asserting land rights through U.S. courts because of conflicting cultural definitions and expectations, particularly the courts’ preference for written documentation over oral testimony; however, courts are beginning to recognize the need to accommodate such cultural differences for fairer legal outcomes. The Most Valuable Sentence: The final sentence of the passage sums up the key idea:

P1: Intro to the Problem of Legal Recognition across Cultures

Some Native American tribes haven't had their land claims recognized by the U.S. government because their tribal status wasn't acknowledged. In the 1970s, Native Americans tried to gain recognition via the U.S. court system, but their arguments had to be framed in legal terms that didn't always match up with their own cultural perspectives.

P2: The Mashpee Wampanoag Case—Specific Example of the Problem

A notable example involved the Mashpee Wampanoag, whose legal case hinged on whether they qualified as a "tribe" as defined by previous court rulings. When non-Mashpee residents gained control of the town, Mashpee lands were sold off, leading to the Mashpee suing under a law protecting tribal land. The town countered by arguing the Mashpee didn’t meet the legal definition of a tribe, so the court required the Mashpee to prove they were a self-governing group with a defined territory.

P3: Cultural Clash and Its Consequences / Hints of Improvement

The town insisted the Mashpee show written proof of self-government and land ownership, while the Mashpee relied on oral testimony, in line with their traditions. The legal system dismissed the oral evidence, leading to the Mashpee’s defeat in court. However, there have been recent improvements: courts are beginning to realize that rigidly sticking to their own discourse can block fair decisions, and they are starting to better accommodate cultural differences.

1.

Which one of the following most completely and accurately expresses the main point of the passage?

  1. Land claim suits such as

    Too Strong: must

    This answer somewhat runs contrary to the final sentence of the passage, which is saying that courts are wising up to the idea that they can't demand written documentation out of oral cultures. This also sounds nothing like what we're looking for, which is that "courts can struggle to provide fair outcomes to groups when there are differences in discourse between those two cultures".

    0% picked this

  2. Land claim suits such as

    Wrong Theme

    The beginning of this is fine, but it should say "... underscore the need for U.S. courts to recognize that they may need to accommodate differences in discourse in order to render a fair legal decision". This is making it seem like the main theme was, "We've got to redefine tribe."

    1% picked this

  3. Correct

    Land claim suits such as

    Why this is right

    This nicely combines the Example with the Theme. The language of "complications that can result when cultures with different systems of discourse attempt to resolve disputes" matches nicely with our two Theme sentences: the end of the 1st and the end of the last paragraph.

    Skill tested: Main Point · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    79% picked this

  4. Land claim suits such the

    Wrong Theme

    The beginning of this is fine, but it should say "... pout out the need for U.S. courts to recognize that they may need to accommodate differences in discourse in order to render a fair legal decision". This is making it seem like the main theme was, "U.S. courts are disingenuous about what sorts of evidence they're really willing to accept".

    3% picked this

  5. Land claim suits such as

    Wrong Theme

    The beginning of this is fine, but it should say "... bring to light the need for U.S. courts to recognize that they may need to accommodate differences in discourse in order to render a fair legal decision". This is making it seem like the main theme was specifically about Native Americans and specifically about precedent. This example happened to be Native Americans, and it happened to be about oral vs. written evidence of self-governance. But the big idea that "this process brought to light" was about how differing systems of discourse between any cultures could present legal difficulties (whether it relates to precedent, oral vs. written testimony, or other stuff).

    16% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free