Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT106 S3 Q6 Explanation

Jane: Television programs and movies

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsStrengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Jane: Television programs and movies that depict violence among teenagers are extremely popular. Given how influential these media are, we have good reason to believe that these depictions cause young people to engage in violent behavior. Hence, depictions of violence among teenagers should be in those programs and movies promoted to young audiences.

Maurice: But you are recommending nothing short of censorship! Besides which, your claim that television and movie depictions of violence cause violence is mistaken: violence and television by centuries.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
6.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens

Answer choices

  1. No Impact1% picked this

    The most violent characters depicted in movies and on television programs are adult characters who are

    This seems to drift away from the focus of the argument. We care about depictions of teen violence and whether they make teens more likely to engage in violence. This is about depictions of adult violence.

  2. Correct93% picked this

    The movies that have been shown to have the most influence on young people’s behavior are those that

    Why this is right

    This helps support the priority set by the author's conclusion. She is saying, "Let's eliminate depictions of teen violence from movies and TV. If we can't do it across the board, then let's at least do it for those shows and movies promoted to young audiences." Saying that suggests that the biggest source of the potential problem would be shows / movies promoted to young audiences. This answer corroborates that assumption -- it's saying, "Yup, the shows / movies that are most likely to influence teens' behavior (including in violent ways) are the ones that are promoted to young audiences." So this strengthens by affirming that our author's #1 concern (shows / movies promoted to young audiences) really is the #1 concern. When authors are suggesting plans / recommendations to address some goal or problem, we can strengthen by showing that this plan / recommendation would address the root of the problem or the most significant source of the problem.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. No Impact1% picked this

    The people who make the most profits in the movie and television industry are those who can successfully promote their work to

    This seems to drift away from the focus of the argument. We care about depictions of teen violence and whether they make teen viewers more likely to engage in violence. This is about who in the movie / TV industry makes the most money, and it has nothing to do with violent depictions.

  4. Weakens, if anything3% picked this

    Many adolescents who engage in violent behavior had already displayed such behavior before they were exposed

    This answer suggests that violence in young people isn't caused by being exposed to violence in shows / movies, since the violence exists before they've even been exposed to violence in shows / movies.

  5. Weakens, if anything3% picked this

    Among the producers who make both movies and television programs, many voluntarily restrict the subject matter of films

    This answer is written so broadly that we're not sure if it has any specific connection to this conversation about depictions of teen violence. But, in general, if an author is concluding, "We need to prohibit X", then it weakens to say, "(we don't need to prohibit it, because) people are already voluntarily refraining from doing X."

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free