Ethicist: A person who treats others well is more worthy of praise if this treatment is at least partially motivated by feelings of compassion than if it is entirely motivated by cold and dispassionate concern for moral obligation.
Statements
Conditional (if = sufficient, LEFT of arrow) treating others well more worthy when at least partially → of praise motivated by compassion
(In more conversational terms, this rule says that being nice to others out of some clinical, dispassionate obedience to moral obligation is less praiseworthy than being nice to others with some feelings of compassion on top.)
We give extra praise to those who feel compassion while treating others well, even though one can't choose whether to have feelings (meanwhile, they can choose to treat others well in the first place).
Evaluate
We typically see two patterns for the correct answer on Must Be False: 1. it contradicts a conditional rule presented 2. it contradicts an available inference we can make by combining claims
The first sentence was a conditional rule.
By combining the first and second sentence, we could infer something like, .
Goal
Look for an answer contradicting the conditional (match the trigger, but don't deliver the outcome): X treats others well, but feels nothing doing so. Y treats others well, in part because Y feels compassion. X deserves at least as much praise as Y.
Or look for an answer contradicting our inference, something like, .