Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT105 S4 Q21 Explanation

Ethicist: A person who treats

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMust be False

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Ethicist: A person who treats others well is more worthy of praise if this treatment is at least partially motivated by feelings of compassion than if it is entirely motivated by cold and dispassionate concern for moral obligation. This is so despite the fact is morally right but cannot choose to have feelings.

What this question is testing

Must be False

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
21.

If the ethicist's statements are true, then each of the following could

Answer choices

  1. Compatible9% picked this

    Only actions that are at least partially the result of a person's feelings should be used in measuring

    This seems to go along with the gist of the paragraph, since it's associating praise with actions that are at least partially motivated by feelings. It would be correct if it said "only actions that are under a person's control should be used", because that would contradict the inference we made.

  2. Compatible8% picked this

    If a person feels compassion toward the people affected by that person's actions, yet these actions diminish the welfare of those people,

    This doesn't contradict our conditional or our available inference. It's compatible with the passage that when people's actions diminish the welfare of other people, we don't praise that person.

  3. Correct61% picked this

    Only what is subject to a person's choice should be used in measuring the praiseworthiness

    Why this is right

    This contradicts the inference we can make by combining the two sentences we were given. Fact 1: we measure a person as more praiseworthy if they have feelings of compassion that partially motivate their kind actions. Fact 2: they can't choose whether to have those feelings Inference: we sometimes measure a person as more praiseworthy for something they can't choose Meanwhile, this answer is contradicting that, saying that we only use stuff that people can choose to do, when measuring their praiseworthiness.

    Skill tested: Must be False · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Compatible12% picked this

    Someone who acts without feelings of compassion toward those affected by the actions is worthy of praise if those actions enhance the

    This is about whether or not the person is worthy of praise. This paragraph wasn't ever talking in Absolute, yes/no language (do you or don't you deserve praise). The paragraph was about Relative amounts of praiseworthiness (more deserving / less deserving). Since the paragraph wasn't talking about this, this answer can't contradict the paragraph.

  5. Compatible10% picked this

    If someone wants to have compassion toward others but does not, that person is

    This is about whether or not the person is worthy of praise. This paragraph wasn't ever talking in Absolute, yes/no language (do you or don't you deserve praise). The paragraph was about Relative amounts of praiseworthiness (more deserving / less deserving). Since the paragraph wasn't talking about this, this answer can't contradict the paragraph.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free