Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT104 S2 P4 Q25 Explanation

Mayan Collapse

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAuthor's AttitudeSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

In The Dynamics of Apocalypse, John Lowe attempts to solve the mystery of the collapse of the Classic Mayan civilization. Lowe bases his study on a detailed examination of the known archaeological record. Like previous investigators, Lowe relies on dated monuments to construct a step-by-step account of the actual collapse. Using the stopped throughout the area, and within a hundred years, the Classic Mayan civilization all but vanished.

Having established this chronology, Lowe sets forth a plausible explanation of the collapse that accommodates the available archaeological evidence. He theorizes that Classic Mayan civilization was brought down by the interaction of several factors, set in motion by population growth. An increase in population, particularly within the elite segment of society, necessitated states thus began to break down, and each downfall triggered others, until the entire civilization collapsed.

If there is a central flaw in Lowe’s explanation, it is that the entire edifice rests on the assumption that the available evidence paints a true picture of how the collapse proceeded. However, it is difficult to know how accurately the archaeological record reflects historic activity, especially of a complex civilization such established that some remained heavily settled long after the custom of carving dynastic monuments had ceased.

What this question is testing

Author's Attitude

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
25.

It can be inferred from the passage that the author would describe the method Lowe used to construct a step-by-step chronology of the actual collapse

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong: daringly innovative20% picked this

    daringly innovative but

    The idea of "daringly innovative" is pretty much contradicted by the 2nd and 3rd sentences of the passage, in which the author says that Lowe uses the known archaeological record and relies on dated monuments like previous investigators.

  2. Correct74% picked this

    generally accepted but

    Why this is right

    This ends up being supported by combining the early 1st paragraph with the last paragraph. We can support "generally accepted" because Lowe uses the known archaeological record and relies on dated monuments like previous investigators. We can support "questionable" because of the final paragraph: If there's a central flaw, it's that the edifice rests on the assumption that the available record paints a true picture. However, it is difficult to know whether the archaeological record reflects historic activity.

    Skill tested: Author's Attitude · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Bad Matches3% picked this

    very reliable but

    There's nothing in the passage suggesting that Lowe's method is outdated / old-fashioned, or that there is a new, modern option that's better. Also, the author indicates in the last paragraph that relying on the archaeological is not very reliable. It's difficult to know whether it accurately reflects historic activity.

  4. Out of Scope: unscientific2% picked this

    unscientific but

    The author never charges that Lowe's method is unscientific in any way. After all, it makes use of the known archaeological record and relies on evidence that previous investigators also relied on.

  5. Too Strong: brilliant Opposite: unconventional1% picked this

    unconventional but

    The idea of "unconventional" is pretty much contradicted by the 2nd and 3rd sentences of the passage, in which the author says that Lowe uses the known archaeological record and relies on dated monuments like previous investigators. The author also is never as effusively complimentary as "brilliant".

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free