Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT104 S2 P4 Q24 Explanation

Mayan Collapse

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAnalogySociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

In The Dynamics of Apocalypse, John Lowe attempts to solve the mystery of the collapse of the Classic Mayan civilization. Lowe bases his study on a detailed examination of the known archaeological record. Like previous investigators, Lowe relies on dated monuments to construct a step-by-step account of the actual collapse. Using the stopped throughout the area, and within a hundred years, the Classic Mayan civilization all but vanished.

Having established this chronology, Lowe sets forth a plausible explanation of the collapse that accommodates the available archaeological evidence. He theorizes that Classic Mayan civilization was brought down by the interaction of several factors, set in motion by population growth. An increase in population, particularly within the elite segment of society, necessitated states thus began to break down, and each downfall triggered others, until the entire civilization collapsed.

If there is a central flaw in Lowe’s explanation, it is that the entire edifice rests on the assumption that the available evidence paints a true picture of how the collapse proceeded. However, it is difficult to know how accurately the archaeological record reflects historic activity, especially of a complex civilization such established that some remained heavily settled long after the custom of carving dynastic monuments had ceased.

What this question is testing

Analogy

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
24.

Which one of the following is most closely analogous to the assumption Lowe makes about the relationship between monument construction

Answer choices

  1. Bad Match13% picked this

    A person assumes that the shortage of fresh produce on the shelves of a grocery store is due to the effects of poor

    The idea of "fresh produce on the shelves" seems most analogous to "fresh monuments at the site". So we'd want an answer that sounds like "a person assumes that a grocery store is going out of business due to the shortage of fresh produce on the shelves".

  2. No Match2% picked this

    A person assumes that a movie theater only shows foreign films because the titles of the films shown there are

    This doesn't have anything to do with, "Since I don't see any more updates from thing X, I'm assuming that thing X isn't being used anymore."

  3. Opposite5% picked this

    A person assumes that a restaurant is under new ownership because the restaurant’s menu has changed drastically since the last

    We're looking for something like "the owners have left, since there don't seem to be any new features being added". This is more like "there are brand new owners, since there seem to be a lot of new features".

  4. Half Match8% picked this

    A person assumes that a corporation has been sold because there is a new name for the corporation on the sign outside the

    The idea of a corporation being sold is a good match for a site being abandoned. But the part of this answer that would have to match "they've ceased building new monuments" would be "there's a new name on the sign outside". That seems almost opposite. A better match would be like, "A corporation has been sold because they haven't run any new commercials in a while / they haven't updated their outdoor signage in a long time"

  5. Correct72% picked this

    A person assumes a friend has sold her stamp collection because the friend has stopped

    Why this is right

    This has the same feel of, "Once new stuff has ceased, the thing has been abandoned". Once new monuments have ceased being built, the site has been abandoned. Once new stamps have ceased being added, the stamp collection has been abandoned.

    Skill tested: Analogy · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free