Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT104 S1 Q14 Explanation

Critic: Many popular psychological

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsRole

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Critic: Many popular psychological theories are poor theories in that they are inelegant and do not help to dispel the mystery that surrounds our psyche. However, this is not really important. The theories produce the right greater success than their more scientific rivals.

What this question is testing

Role

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
14.

The statement about the relative therapeutic success of many popular psychological theories plays which one of the following roles

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong: disprove4% picked this

    It is used to disprove evidence against

    There is evidence against these theories (presented by the author herself): they are inelegant and don't dispel the mystery. But this last claim isn't proving either of those claims untrue. This last claim is supporting the idea that those claims, while true, aren't important.

  2. Correct64% picked this

    It is used to override some considerations against

    Why this is right

    There are considerations introduced that go against these theories (presented by the author herself): they are inelegant and don't dispel the mystery. And this last claim is supporting the idea that those claims, while true, aren't really important. What matters more, the author thinks, is that the theories produce the right results. This last claim is part of the support for the author's implicit notion that "the therapeutic success of these theories is more important than (overrides) the worries that they are inelegant theories that don't help dispel the mystery surrounding our psyche." This answer is very conversational. If we were looking for something formal like, "A premise that supports an intermediate conclusion", we would need to loosen our grip and try this on for size.

    Skill tested: Role · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Bad Conclusion Match8% picked this

    It is used to suggest that popular psychological theories are actually better scientific explanations than

    This claim is used for support, but it's used to suggest that "being inelegant and unhelpful at dispelling mystique are less important than being able to achieve better therapeutic results". The author hasn't committed to a strong idea that (all?) popular theories are better scientific explanations than their rivals. If anything, the author's final claim concedes that the rivals are more scientific but thinks that many popular theories are nonetheless worthy of consideration because, despite being poor scientific explanations, they are able to achieve great results.

  4. Too Strong12% picked this

    It is used to illustrate what the critic takes to be the most important aspect

    Too Strong: most important Too Broad: scientific theories The author seems to think that therapeutic results are a more important way to evaluate these psychological theories. The author is never suggesting that the most important aspect of a scientific theory is therapeutic success. Einstein's Theory of Relativity probably doesn't have a lot of therapeutic success. This author would call Einstein's scientific theory largely a failure, then?

  5. Bad Conclusion Match13% picked this

    It is used to suggest that the popular theories may not be as devoid of explanatory power as one

    This claim is used for support, but it's used to suggest that "being inelegant and unhelpful at dispelling mystique are less important than being able to achieve better therapeutic results". The author isn't trying to say that these theories really do have explanatory power. She's more saying, despite lacking some explanatory power, they are still valuable for being able to achieve great results.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free