Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT104 S1 Q10 Explanation

Sales manager: Last year

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsWeaken

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Sales manager: Last year the total number of meals sold in our company's restaurants was much higher than it was the find our meals desirable.

Accountant: If you look at individual restaurants, however, you find that the number of meals sold actually decreased substantially at every one of our restaurants that was in operation both last year and the year before. The desirability of our meals to consumers has clearly decreased, given that this group of restaurants-the between last year and the year before-demonstrates a trend toward fewer sales.

What this question is testing

Weaken

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion less likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that look negative but attack a claim the argument never relied on.

Winning move

Find the assumption the argument depends on, then pick the choice that undermines it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
10.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously calls into question

Answer choices

  1. Strengthens10% picked this

    The company’s restaurants last year dropped from their menus most of the new dishes that had been

    This might feel like an Alternate Explanation for why the restaurant is selling fewer meals at older locations, but it actually still conforms to the general thought that consumers find the meals less desirable ("Ahhh, they got rid of the McRib? Nevermind, I don't want to go there any more.")

  2. Strengthens, if anything8% picked this

    Prior to last year there was an overall downward trend in

    This softly pushes back against alternate explanations like, "Last year was just a down year because of the pandemic. We'll be back to our normal numbers this year, since people still desire our meals." It makes it sound more like this company has been on the decline for a couple of years now.

  3. Weak Impact8% picked this

    Those of the company’s restaurants that did increase their sales last year did not offer large discounts on

    If this answer said, "The restaurants that did increase sales did offer large discounts to attract customers", that would sound like a strengthener, because it would suggest that desirability is low enough that restaurants had to stoop to gimmicks to get people in the door. But it doesn't have a big weakening impact to say that restaurants that increased sales did not offer large discounts. They still might have offered small discounts or offered large special prizes or other gimmicks.

  4. No Impact3% picked this

    Sales of the company’s most expensive meal contributed little to the overall

    Zooming on the most expensive meal isn't really that valuable a data point. We have no idea if the most expensive meal is even a popular choice or a significant source of revenue to begin with. If anything, this might strengthen slightly by pushing back against the likelihood that people have been avoiding the restaurant because they're poorer than they were two years ago. (If money were the main reason for a decline in sales, you'd expect the most expensive meal to take a particularly big hit).

  5. Correct72% picked this

    Most of the company’s restaurants that were in operation throughout both last year and the year before are located in areas where residents experienced

    Why this is right

    This provides an Alternate Explanation for why restaurants that have been open 2+ years are selling fewer meals this past year. These older locations are found in places that experienced a severe decline in income last year, so it makes sense that people would be eating out less across the board. Thus, there's no reason to blame the decline in sales to decreased desirability of the product, when it sounds like it could be explained as an industry-wide problem that's more connected to financially struggling people.

    Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free