Reading Comprehension

PT103 · S4 · P3 · Q18 Dolphin Die-off

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Between June 1987 and May 1988, the bodies of at least 740 bottlenose dolphins out of a total coastal population of 3,000 to 5,000 washed ashore on the Atlantic coast of the United States.

Topic

The cause of a massive die-off of bottlenose dolphins on the Atlantic coast in 1987–1988.

Framework

Answer / Explain

Main Point

The passage examines why a severe die-off of bottlenose dolphins occurred, presenting a commonly accepted explanation (brevetoxin poisoning from an algal bloom) but ultimately arguing that a sudden increase in synthetic pollutants, such as PCBs, was likely the main precipitating factor, with brevetoxin possibly playing a secondary role. (The “most valuable sentence” is at the end of the final paragraph: )

P1: The Scale and Features of the Dolphin Die-Off

Between 1987–1988, about half the coastal bottlenose dolphins died in an unprecedented event, with affected dolphins showing a wide variety of symptoms, likely due to a massive, opportunistic bacterial infection.

P2: Possible Toxins Identified

Researchers tested dolphin tissues for natural and synthetic toxins, finding brevetoxin from an algal bloom in some, and PCBs—a manmade pollutant—in almost all dolphins.

P3: Brevetoxin Hypothesis

The research team initially concluded the red tide algal toxin (brevetoxin) was the main culprit, as there had been a bloom of this alga in the area. The dolphins’ stressed, emaciated state also likely released more pollutants from their fat, making them even more vulnerable to infection.

18.

It can be inferred from the passage that the author would most probably agree with which one of the following statements about brevetoxin?

  1. It may have been responsible

    Contradicted

    One of our two support lines from the 4th paragraph said, "Although brevetoxin may have been a contributing factor", so the author definitely thinks that brevetoxin could have contributed to the ultimate bacterial infection that killed the dolphins.

    4% picked this

  2. It forms more easily when

    Trap

    Not in Support Window Unknown Comparison: forms more easily This doesn't sound like either of our support lines: - the specific effects of brevetoxin on dolphins are unknown - brevetoxin may have been a contributing factor (in killing all those dolphins) The author never discusses conditions under which brevetoxin forms more easily.

    7% picked this

  3. It damages liver function and

    Contradicted

    This seems to contradict the first of our two support lines: - the specific effects of brevetoxin on dolphins are unknown - brevetoxin may have been a contributing factor (in killing all those dolphins) This answer makes it sound like the author knows the effects of brevetoxin on dolphins. This is grabbing language (damaging liver function and immune system) that was used in reference to PCBs, not brevetoxin.

    17% picked this

  4. It is unlikely to be

    Contradicted

    One of our two support lines from the 4th paragraph said, "Although brevetoxin may have been a contributing factor", so the author definitely thinks that brevetoxin could have contributed to the ultimate bacterial infection that killed the dolphins.

    9% picked this

  5. Correct

    It is unlikely to have

    Why this is right

    This sounds like the gist-y prediction we made, "Brevetoxin was not the #1 culprit". The author starts the final paragraph by saying, "This explanation [that primarily blames brevetoxin poisoning for the die-off] is not entirely plausible. First, ____ . Second, dolphins began dying in June, hundreds of miles north of and some months earlier than the October red tide bloom." The red tide bloom was the source of the supposed brevetoxin poisoning, so the author was doing an Effect w/o Cause plausibility weakener by saying, "Yo, the dolphins started dying 3 months earlier and hundreds of miles north of where the brevetoxin poisoning supposedly took place".

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    63% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free