Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT103 S4 P3 Q18 Explanation

Dolphin Die-off

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAuthor OpinionScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Between June 1987 and May 1988, the bodies of at least 740 bottlenose dolphins out of a total coastal population of 3,000 to 5,000 washed ashore on the Atlantic coast of the United States. Since some of the dead animals never washed ashore, the overall disaster was presumably worse; perhaps 50 percent liver, lung, pancreas, and heart, which suggested a massive opportunistic bacterial infection of already weakened animals.

Tissues from the stricken dolphins were analyzed for a variety of toxins. Brevetoxin, a toxin produced by the blooming of the alga Ptychodiscus brevis, was present in eight out of seventeen dolphins tested. Tests for synthetic were present in almost all animals tested.

The research team concluded that brevetoxin poisoning was the most likely cause of the illnesses that killed the dolphins. Although P. brevis is ordinarily not found along the Atlantic coast, an unusual bloom of this organism—such blooms are called “red tides” because of the reddish color imparted by the blooming algae—did occur The combined impact made the dolphins vulnerable to opportunistic bacterial infection, the ultimate cause of death.

For several reasons, however, this explanation is not entirely plausible. First, bottlenose dolphins and P. brevis red tides are both common in the Gulf of Mexico, yet no dolphin die-off of a similar magnitude has been noted there. Second, dolphins began dying in June, hundreds of miles north of and some months that actually precipitated the die-off was a sharp increase in the dolphins’ exposure to synthetic pollutants.

What this question is testing

Author Opinion

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
18.

It can be inferred from the passage that the author would most probably agree with which one of the

Answer choices

  1. Contradicted4% picked this

    It may have been responsible for the dolphins’ skin lesions but could not have contributed

    One of our two support lines from the 4th paragraph said, "Although brevetoxin may have been a contributing factor", so the author definitely thinks that brevetoxin could have contributed to the ultimate bacterial infection that killed the dolphins.

  2. Trap7% picked this

    It forms more easily when both P. brevis and synthetic pollutants are present in

    Not in Support Window Unknown Comparison: forms more easily This doesn't sound like either of our support lines: - the specific effects of brevetoxin on dolphins are unknown - brevetoxin may have been a contributing factor (in killing all those dolphins) The author never discusses conditions under which brevetoxin forms more easily.

  3. Contradicted17% picked this

    It damages liver function and immune system responses in bottlenose dolphins but may not have triggered

    This seems to contradict the first of our two support lines: - the specific effects of brevetoxin on dolphins are unknown - brevetoxin may have been a contributing factor (in killing all those dolphins) This answer makes it sound like the author knows the effects of brevetoxin on dolphins. This is grabbing language (damaging liver function and immune system) that was used in reference to PCBs, not brevetoxin.

  4. Contradicted10% picked this

    It is unlikely to be among the factors that contributed to

    One of our two support lines from the 4th paragraph said, "Although brevetoxin may have been a contributing factor", so the author definitely thinks that brevetoxin could have contributed to the ultimate bacterial infection that killed the dolphins.

  5. Correct63% picked this

    It is unlikely to have caused the die-off because it was not present in the dolphins’ environment

    Why this is right

    This sounds like the gist-y prediction we made, "Brevetoxin was not the #1 culprit". The author starts the final paragraph by saying, "This explanation [that primarily blames brevetoxin poisoning for the die-off] is not entirely plausible. First, ____ . Second, dolphins began dying in June, hundreds of miles north of and some months earlier than the October red tide bloom." The red tide bloom was the source of the supposed brevetoxin poisoning, so the author was doing an Effect w/o Cause plausibility weakener by saying, "Yo, the dolphins started dying 3 months earlier and hundreds of miles north of where the brevetoxin poisoning supposedly took place".

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free