Reading Comprehension

PT103 · S4 · P3 · Q17 Dolphin Die-off

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Between June 1987 and May 1988, the bodies of at least 740 bottlenose dolphins out of a total coastal population of 3,000 to 5,000 washed ashore on the Atlantic coast of the United States.

Goal

Let's get rid of the four answers we can match up with the passage.

17.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the organization of the last paragraph?

  1. Correct

    One explanation is criticized and

    Why this is right

    Sure, this works. The author criticizes the brevetoxin explanation concluded by the research team: "This explanation is not plausible: First, Second, Finally" And then the author proposes her preferred explanation, which is that pollution was the main culprit: "An alternative hypothesis is _____ ."

    Skill tested: Organization · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    82% picked this

  2. An argument is advanced and

    Reversed Chronological Order

    The first half of the last paragraph is "refuting" (too strong) the explanation of the research team. Then the second half is advancing the author's argument that the dolphins were killed by an uptick in exposure to pollutants.

    4% picked this

  3. Objections against a hypothesis are

    Bad 2nd and 3rd Ingredients

    The first part is correct: the author advances 3 objections against the research team's hypothesis. But after that the proposes an alternative hypothesis. She doesn't explain the research team's hypothesis more fully or reject her own objections to it.

    3% picked this

  4. New evidence in favor of

    Neither Part Matches

    There is no new evidence offered. There is evidence against a theory. And the theory is not reaffirmed. The theory is deeply undermined, before the author then proposes an alternative theory.

    4% picked this

  5. Discrepancies between two explanations are

    No Third Explanation

    There are only two explanations in this passage, the research team's explanation that the deaths were primarily from brevetoxin poisoning, and the author's explanation that the deaths were primarily from exposure to pollutants.

    8% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free