Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT103 S4 P3 Q17 Explanation

Dolphin Die-off

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsOrganizationScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Between June 1987 and May 1988, the bodies of at least 740 bottlenose dolphins out of a total coastal population of 3,000 to 5,000 washed ashore on the Atlantic coast of the United States. Since some of the dead animals never washed ashore, the overall disaster was presumably worse; perhaps 50 percent liver, lung, pancreas, and heart, which suggested a massive opportunistic bacterial infection of already weakened animals.

Tissues from the stricken dolphins were analyzed for a variety of toxins. Brevetoxin, a toxin produced by the blooming of the alga Ptychodiscus brevis, was present in eight out of seventeen dolphins tested. Tests for synthetic were present in almost all animals tested.

The research team concluded that brevetoxin poisoning was the most likely cause of the illnesses that killed the dolphins. Although P. brevis is ordinarily not found along the Atlantic coast, an unusual bloom of this organism—such blooms are called “red tides” because of the reddish color imparted by the blooming algae—did occur The combined impact made the dolphins vulnerable to opportunistic bacterial infection, the ultimate cause of death.

For several reasons, however, this explanation is not entirely plausible. First, bottlenose dolphins and P. brevis red tides are both common in the Gulf of Mexico, yet no dolphin die-off of a similar magnitude has been noted there. Second, dolphins began dying in June, hundreds of miles north of and some months that actually precipitated the die-off was a sharp increase in the dolphins’ exposure to synthetic pollutants.

What this question is testing

Organization

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
17.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the organization of the

Answer choices

  1. Correct82% picked this

    One explanation is criticized and a different explanation

    Why this is right

    Sure, this works. The author criticizes the brevetoxin explanation concluded by the research team: "This explanation is not plausible: First, Second, Finally" And then the author proposes her preferred explanation, which is that pollution was the main culprit: "An alternative hypothesis is _____ ."

    Skill tested: Organization · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Reversed Chronological Order3% picked this

    An argument is advanced and then refuted by means of an

    The first half of the last paragraph is "refuting" (too strong) the explanation of the research team. Then the second half is advancing the author's argument that the dolphins were killed by an uptick in exposure to pollutants.

  3. Bad 2nd and 3rd Ingredients2% picked this

    Objections against a hypothesis are advanced, the hypothesis is explained more fully, and then the

    The first part is correct: the author advances 3 objections against the research team's hypothesis. But after that the proposes an alternative hypothesis. She doesn't explain the research team's hypothesis more fully or reject her own objections to it.

  4. Neither Part Matches4% picked this

    New evidence in favor of a theory is described, and then the

    There is no new evidence offered. There is evidence against a theory. And the theory is not reaffirmed. The theory is deeply undermined, before the author then proposes an alternative theory.

  5. No Third Explanation8% picked this

    Discrepancies between two explanations are noted, and a third explanation

    There are only two explanations in this passage, the research team's explanation that the deaths were primarily from brevetoxin poisoning, and the author's explanation that the deaths were primarily from exposure to pollutants.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free