Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT102 S2 Q16 Explanation

Political scientist: The dissemination

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsNecessary Assumption

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Political scientist: The dissemination of political theories is in principle able to cause change in existing social structures. However, all political theories are formulated in the educationally privileged setting of the university, leading to convoluted language that is alienating to many individuals outside academia who would be important agents of change. It those outside the university context to render it into accessible, clear language.

What this question is testing

Necessary Assumption

Your task

Find the assumption the argument requires in order for its conclusion to hold.

Common trap

Answers that would help the argument but aren't strictly required (sufficient, not necessary).

Winning move

Negate each choice — the right one breaks the argument when negated.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
16.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong: most important9% picked this

    Persons outside academic settings are the most important agents of change to

    We know that "many individuals outside academia are important agents of change", but nothing in the passage commits the author to thinking that people outside academia are the most important agents of change.

  2. Out of Scope: attempt to change11% picked this

    Persons within academic settings who formulate political theories attempt to change

    The passage didn't seem to necessarily imply that the political theories being formulated in the university setting were being formulated by people determined to change existing social structures. If we negated this and said that the people formulating the theories aren't attempting to change social structures, that wouldn't really weaken the author's argument. The author was envisioning a causal sequence in which the theories get formulated in a university setting, then people from outside the university render the theory into accessible/clear language, and then many individuals from outside academia that are important agents of change hear these plainspoken theories and use them to change social structures. Nothing in the author's story involved the university theory-creators getting out there and hitting the streets, trying to change social structures.

  3. Out of Scope3% picked this

    Persons outside academic settings are better left out of the initial formulation

    Out of Scope: better left out Causal Backstory for Premise The author hasn't taken a position on whether it's good or bad (better or worse) that all political theories are formulated in the university setting. She just said they are all formulated there. We don't know if she holds the opinion that non-university people would probably mess up the initial formulation and should thus be left out. This answer is what some would call a Premise Booster, because it has nothing to do with the conclusion "that there's a special role for people outside the university context who can render a political theory into clear and accessible language". It's just taking the premise that "all theories are formulated in the university setting" and trying to fill in a backstory for that ... "because it's better to leave non-university people out of the initial formulation".

  4. Out of Scope10% picked this

    Persons outside academic settings stand to gain more from the dissemination of political theories

    Out of Scope: stand to gain more The author never implied that people outside academic setting have more to gain from disseminating political theories than do university people. The author was just thinking that these theories emerge from the universities in really convoluted language that normal outsiders won't grab on to and run with. For the author, the specialness of people outside academia is their ability to take this theory and render it into clear normal language. It's not that they have more to gain from disseminating the theory. it's that they will be more effective at disseminating the theory because of their clearer, more accessible language.

  5. Correct67% picked this

    Persons within academic settings are less willing or less able than persons outside to write

    Why this is right

    Our author Assumes this Difference. The reason she thinks there's a special role for people outside the university context is that they will be better at taking convoluted academic language and rendering it into accessible, clear language. If we negate this, it would say, "People within academic settings are at least as willing and at least as able to write in a straightforward way as are people outside the academic setting". If that's true, then why would we say there's any special role for the outsiders? The insiders are just as good and just as willing to take a densely written political theory and turn it into clear and accessible language.

    Skill tested: Necessary Assumption · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free