Air temperature surrounding rhododendrons, which can grow 12 feet tall, is likely to differ from air temperature surrounding crocuses, which are normally only a
Why this is right
This allows us a way to argue that the conclusion could be wrong! Let's say temperature at ground level is actually 1.9°. Since the temp is more than 2 greater up 12 feet, that means the air temperature 12 feet up is over 3.9° C. The temperature 6 feet up, where our six foot scientist is holding her thermometer is 2.9° C. This would allow crocuses to be unopened (because it's less than 2° at ground level). And this would allow rhododendron leaves to be uncurled (since it's more than 0° twelve feet up where they live). But if the thermometer says 1° even though it's really 2.9°, then we've shown how the thermometer could be off by more than 1° C, even though we're seeing unopened crocus blossoms and uncurled rhododendron leaves. Is this answer insane? 100% certified crazy. They're talking about a temperature change of more than 2° C (which is like 5° F) between ground level and 12 feet up? I mean, yes, if you have a room with pitched ceilings and you climb up a 12 foot ladder, you will feel that it is at least 5° F warmer at the top of the ladder. But outdoors it's a little insane to think that air temperatures would vary that much. But that's not our job. The question system isn't saying, "Do you think this answer is true?" It's asking, "If you pretend this answer is true, would it allow you to weaken the argument?" And this is the only answer helping us to show how you could see uncurled leaves, unopened blossoms, and 1° on the thermometer, even though it's either under 0° or above 2° in reality.
Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.