Reading Comprehension

PT102 · S1 · P4 · Q25 Organicist vs. Analytic

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Scientists typically advocate the analytic method of studying complex systems: systems are divided into component parts that are investigated separately.

Topic

The debate between the analytic method and organicism in studying complex systems.

Framework

Challenge Position

Main Point

The author challenges the organicists' rejection of the analytic method, arguing that organicists misunderstood how the analytic method actually works and failed to provide valid reasons for abandoning it. ( — final sentence)

P1: Introduction to Analytic Method and Organicist Critique

Scientists usually break down complex systems to study their parts individually (analytic method), but 19th-century critics (organicists) argued this loses essential complexity. They introduced organicism, which sees parts as interdependent and defined by the whole.

P2: Theory of Internal Relations

Organicism relies on the theory of internal relations: entities are fundamentally defined by their relationships within a whole, and these relationships alter the very nature of the entities involved.

P3: Issues with Internal Relations

Problem: Not every property an entity has counts as a defining characteristic; entities can have relationships that don't actually change their core identity.

25.

The passage most strongly supports the ascription of which one of the following views to scientists who use the analytic method?

  1. A complex system is best

    Contradicted

    We were told in that last paragraph that "proponents of the [analytic] method thus did not study parts of a system in full isolation from the system as a whole."

    19% picked this

  2. Correct

    The parts of a system

    Why this is right

    This matches pretty well with our prediction: "It's important to understand laws and initial conditions of a whole system before you go analyzing its component parts". All we have to go off of when it comes to the analytic method is "before they analyzed the component parts, they first determined both the laws applicable to the whole system and the initial conditions of the system". This answer doesn't stray too far from our available Support Window.

    Skill tested: Non-Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    69% picked this

  3. It is not possible to

    Contradicted

    The one sentence we have to go off of contradicts this: "before they analyzed the component parts, they first determined both the laws applicable to the whole system and the initial conditions of the system". The analytic proponents began by determining the laws governing a system, and then separated parts from one another.

    6% picked this

  4. Because the parts of a

    Wrong Point of View

    This is the organicists' point of view. We know that the analytic method was all about studying parts separately.

    5% picked this

  5. Studying the parts of a

    Too Strong

    Too Strong: eliminates the need Out of Support Window All we have to go off of when it comes to the analytic method is "before they analyzed the component parts, they first determined both the laws applicable to the whole system and the initial conditions of the system". Does anything in there say that "studying parts individually eliminates the need to determine defining characteristics?" Not at all.

    2% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free