Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT102 S1 P3 Q18 Explanation

Intertribalism's Effects

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAuthor's AttitudeSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Even in the midst of its resurgence as a vital tradition, many sociologists have viewed the current form of the powwow, a ceremonial gathering of native Americans, as a sign that tribal culture is in decline. Focusing on the dances and rituals that have recently come to be shared by most tribes, increasing politicization in response to common grievances as the chief causes of the shift toward intertribalism.

Indeed, the rapid diffusion of dance styles, outfits, and songs from one reservation to another offers compelling evidence that intertribalism has been increasing. However, these sociologists have failed to note the concurrent revitalization of many traditions unique to individual tribes. Among the Lakota, for instance, the Sun Dance was revived, after a more complex societal shift is taking place than the theory of Pan-Indianism can account for.

An examination of the theory’s underpinnings may be critical at this point, especially given that native Americans themselves chafe most against the Pan-Indian classification. Like other assimilationist theories with which it is associated, the Pan-Indian view is predicated upon an a priori assumption about the nature of cultural contact: that upon contact there is no evidence that this is happening to native American groups.

Yet the fact remains that intertribal activities are a major facet of native American culture today. Certain dances at powwows, for instance, are announced as intertribal, other as traditional. Likewise, speeches given at the beginnings of powwows are often delivered in English, while the prayer that follows is usually spoken in a is the conscious distinction native Americans make between tribal and intertribal tendencies.

Tribalism, although greatly altered by modern history, remains a potent force among native Americans: It forms a basis for tribal identity, and aligns music and dance with other social and cultural activities important to individual tribes. Intertribal activities, on the other hand, reinforce this identity is directly threatened by outside influences.

What this question is testing

Author's Attitude

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
18.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the author’s attitude toward the theory

Answer choices

  1. Wrong Objection: attribute political motives5% picked this

    critical of its tendency to attribute political motives to

    The author is critical of the theory's tendency to assume that minority cultures fully succumb to majority cultures once they come into contact with each other, but that's the author's only real complaint (other than Pan-Indian theory isn't appreciating the full complexity of the societal shift that's taking place). In the first paragraph, the Pan Indian theorists do say that the effort to take political action to address their common grievances is one of the forces causing there to be more intertribalism. But the author never criticizes this.

  2. Wrong Objection8% picked this

    discomfort at its negative characterization of cultural borrowing by

    The author never talks about Pan-Indian theorists saying bad things about Native Americans' "cultural borrowing". Cultural borrowing is cited in the 4th paragraph (an example was giving a speech in English at the beginning of a powwow, followed by prayer in a native language). That is borrowing from multiple cultures. The Pan-Indians don't say anything specific about using different culture's language in the same ceremony. So there is no specific negative characterization of native Americans' cultural borrowing offered by the Pan-Indians. If we equate "cultural borrowing" with "cultural contact / assimilation" (which we shouldn't), then the answer gets more tempting. We know that Pan-Indian theorists think that cultural contact ultimately leads to the minority society dissolving into the majority society. The Pan-Indian theorists don't really express a clear positive or negative feeling about this. They just predict an eventual dissolution of tribes and complete assimilation into Euroamerican society. There's no opinion about whether that's a good or bad thing. But let's assume it's a bad thing. The Pan-Indians could very well be sad that all these unique tribal identities would get dissolved and merged into the broader Euroamerican society. That would be their negative characterization of cultural borrowing. The author wouldn't disagree with characterizing the dissolution of tribes as something negative. She would also be sad to see the dissolution of tribes and agree that we should characterize such an outcome negatively. She's telling the Pan-Indian theorists, "relax, that's not what's happening. Tribal identities are still strong."

  3. Opposite (if anything)3% picked this

    hopeful about its chances for preserving

    We would expect the predominant attitude to be negative. The author conceded that Pan-Indians are correct to observe an uptick in intertribalism, but otherwise the passage is mainly written to rebut the Pan-Indians. This answer sounds like the author is on board with them.

  4. Out of Scope: desirable consequence5% picked this

    offended by its claim that assimilation is a desirable consequence of

    The Pan-Indian theorists never claim that assimilation is a desirable consequence of cultural contact. They are saying it's an inevitable consequence. Pan-Indian theorists might hate this consequence. They could be understood to be potentially mourning the loss of all these unique tribal identities. They might be lamenting that once a minority society has contact with a majority society, the former assimilates into the latter, while dissolving the identity they previously had.

  5. Correct79% picked this

    skeptical that it is a complete explanation of recent changes in

    Why this is right

    This matches up nicely with the final sentence of the 2nd paragraph, in which the author says: Obviously, a more complex societal shift is taking place than the theory of Pan-Indianism can account for. If that Pan-Indian theory can't account for the shift that's taking place in native American society, then it isn't a complete explanation of the recent changes in native American society.

    Skill tested: Author's Attitude · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free