Reading Comprehension

PT102 · S1 · P3 · Q18 Intertribalism's Effects

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Even in the midst of its resurgence as a vital tradition, many sociologists have viewed the current form of the powwow, a ceremonial gathering of native Americans, as a sign that tribal culture is in decline.

Topic

The current state of powwows and tribal/intertribal identity among Native Americans, challenging the "Pan-Indian" theory.

Framework

Challenge Position

Main Point

Many sociologists claim that increased intertribal activities like shared powwow traditions signal the decline and eventual assimilation of Native American tribal cultures ("Pan-Indianism"). However, the author argues this view is too simplistic and ignores simultaneous revivals of individual tribal traditions—both tribalism and intertribalism are thriving in distinct ways. *The Most Valuable Sentence:* (End of paragraph 2)

P1: Introduction of the Pan-Indian Theory / Conventional View

Many sociologists argue that powwows are evidence of a decline in distinct tribal cultures and the rise of a unifying, assimilating "Pan-Indian" identity, fueled by increased intertribal contact, urbanization, and politicization.

P2: Evidence Against Pan-Indianism's Simplicity

Yes, intertribal traditions are spreading quickly, but the theory ignores the revitalization of specific, unique tribal traditions (like the Sun Dance among the Lakota and traditional societies among Kiowa and Ponca). The real changes are more complex than simple assimilation.

P3: Critiquing Pan-Indian Theory's Assumptions

The Pan-Indian perspective is based on the questionable assumption that contact always leads to total assimilation. Native Americans themselves resist being lumped together, and there's no evidence for total assimilation as the outcome.

18.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the author's attitude toward the theory of Pan-Indianism?

  1. critical of its tendency to

    Wrong Objection: attribute political motives

    The author is critical of the theory's tendency to assume that minority cultures fully succumb to majority cultures once they come into contact with each other, but that's the author's only real complaint (other than Pan-Indian theory isn't appreciating the full complexity of the societal shift that's taking place). In the first paragraph, the Pan Indian theorists do say that the effort to take political action to address their common grievances is one of the forces causing there to be more intertribalism. But the author never criticizes this.

    5% picked this

  2. discomfort at its negative characterization

    Wrong Objection

    The author never talks about Pan-Indian theorists saying bad things about Native Americans' "cultural borrowing". Cultural borrowing is cited in the 4th paragraph (an example was giving a speech in English at the beginning of a powwow, followed by prayer in a native language). That is borrowing from multiple cultures. The Pan-Indians don't say anything specific about using different culture's language in the same ceremony. So there is no specific negative characterization of native Americans' cultural borrowing offered by the Pan-Indians. If we equate "cultural borrowing" with "cultural contact / assimilation" (which we shouldn't), then the answer gets more tempting. We know that Pan-Indian theorists think that cultural contact ultimately leads to the minority society dissolving into the majority society. The Pan-Indian theorists don't really express a clear positive or negative feeling about this. They just predict an eventual dissolution of tribes and complete assimilation into Euroamerican society. There's no opinion about whether that's a good or bad thing. But let's assume it's a bad thing. The Pan-Indians could very well be sad that all these unique tribal identities would get dissolved and merged into the broader Euroamerican society. That would be their negative characterization of cultural borrowing. The author wouldn't disagree with characterizing the dissolution of tribes as something negative. She would also be sad to see the dissolution of tribes and agree that we should characterize such an outcome negatively. She's telling the Pan-Indian theorists, "relax, that's not what's happening. Tribal identities are still strong."

    9% picked this

  3. hopeful about its chances for

    Opposite (if anything)

    We would expect the predominant attitude to be negative. The author conceded that Pan-Indians are correct to observe an uptick in intertribalism, but otherwise the passage is mainly written to rebut the Pan-Indians. This answer sounds like the author is on board with them.

    3% picked this

  4. offended by its claim that

    Out of Scope: desirable consequence

    The Pan-Indian theorists never claim that assimilation is a desirable consequence of cultural contact. They are saying it's an inevitable consequence. Pan-Indian theorists might hate this consequence. They could be understood to be potentially mourning the loss of all these unique tribal identities. They might be lamenting that once a minority society has contact with a majority society, the former assimilates into the latter, while dissolving the identity they previously had.

    5% picked this

  5. Correct

    skeptical that it is a

    Why this is right

    This matches up nicely with the final sentence of the 2nd paragraph, in which the author says: Obviously, a more complex societal shift is taking place than the theory of Pan-Indianism can account for. If that Pan-Indian theory can't account for the shift that's taking place in native American society, then it isn't a complete explanation of the recent changes in native American society.

    Skill tested: Author's Attitude · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    79% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free