Reading Comprehension

PT102 · S1 · P3 · Q17 Intertribalism's Effects

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Even in the midst of its resurgence as a vital tradition, many sociologists have viewed the current form of the powwow, a ceremonial gathering of native Americans, as a sign that tribal culture is in decline.

Topic

The current state of powwows and tribal/intertribal identity among Native Americans, challenging the "Pan-Indian" theory.

Framework

Challenge Position

Main Point

Many sociologists claim that increased intertribal activities like shared powwow traditions signal the decline and eventual assimilation of Native American tribal cultures ("Pan-Indianism"). However, the author argues this view is too simplistic and ignores simultaneous revivals of individual tribal traditions—both tribalism and intertribalism are thriving in distinct ways. *The Most Valuable Sentence:* (End of paragraph 2)

P1: Introduction of the Pan-Indian Theory / Conventional View

Many sociologists argue that powwows are evidence of a decline in distinct tribal cultures and the rise of a unifying, assimilating "Pan-Indian" identity, fueled by increased intertribal contact, urbanization, and politicization.

P2: Evidence Against Pan-Indianism's Simplicity

Yes, intertribal traditions are spreading quickly, but the theory ignores the revitalization of specific, unique tribal traditions (like the Sun Dance among the Lakota and traditional societies among Kiowa and Ponca). The real changes are more complex than simple assimilation.

P3: Critiquing Pan-Indian Theory's Assumptions

The Pan-Indian perspective is based on the questionable assumption that contact always leads to total assimilation. Native Americans themselves resist being lumped together, and there's no evidence for total assimilation as the outcome.

17.

The primary function of the third paragraph is to

  1. search for evidence to corroborate

    Opposite: corroborate

    This is saying the author is trying to corroborate (i.e. support / make more true) the basic assumption of Pan-Indianism. But the author disagrees with Pan-Indianism. He is talking about its underlying assumption in order to say that this assumption is wrong (that's what the last sentence of the 3rd paragraph is doing).

    1% picked this

  2. demonstrate the incorrectness of the

    Wrong Emphasis: natives disagree

    While the first sentence of the paragraph does mention the fact that native American groups disagree with the Pan Indian theory, it's the side idea (and that topic isn't discussed in the rest of the 3rd paragraph). The main idea in the first sentence of the paragraph is that we should look at the theory's underpinnings, and the second sentence of the paragraph tells us the underlying assumption of the theory, which the final sentence then says is an untrue assumption in the case of native Americans. If anything, we'd want this answer to say, "demonstrate the incorrectness of the theory by pointing out that its underlying assumption doesn't hold true for native American groups".

    5% picked this

  3. explain the origin of the

    Out of Scope

    Out of Scope: showing how it evolved This is pretty tempting, since "explain the origin" sounds like it's reinforcing "an examination of the theory's underpinnings". And the second sentence does mention a similarity between Pan-Indianism and other assimilationist theories. But we were never told that Pan-Indianism evolved from these theories, only that it's associated with them. And the author never shows how Pan-Indianism evolved from these theories.

    3% picked this

  4. examine several assimilationist theories in

    Out of Scope: examine several

    The only theory really examined is the Pan-Indian one. In passing, the author tells us that the founding assumption of Pan-Indianism is similar to that of other assimilationist theories, but that doesn't mean that the author spend the 3rd paragraph examining several assimilationist theories.

    1% picked this

  5. Correct

    criticize the theory of Pan-Indianism

    Why this is right

    The author's overall purpose is Challenge Position, so we know the author wants to criticize Pan-Indianism. The 2nd paragraph ended with the author demonstrating that Pan-Indianism is clearly missing part of the story. The 3rd paragraph is saying, "let's look at the faulty idea that underlies this theory". The Pan-Indian view is predicated upon an assumption. However, there is no evidence that this is happening to native American groups. The strong wording of the final sentence justifies the strong wording of "for which there is no supporting evidence".

    Skill tested: Paragraph Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    89% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free