Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT102 S1 P3 Q17 Explanation

Intertribalism's Effects

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsParagraph PurposeSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Even in the midst of its resurgence as a vital tradition, many sociologists have viewed the current form of the powwow, a ceremonial gathering of native Americans, as a sign that tribal culture is in decline. Focusing on the dances and rituals that have recently come to be shared by most tribes, increasing politicization in response to common grievances as the chief causes of the shift toward intertribalism.

Indeed, the rapid diffusion of dance styles, outfits, and songs from one reservation to another offers compelling evidence that intertribalism has been increasing. However, these sociologists have failed to note the concurrent revitalization of many traditions unique to individual tribes. Among the Lakota, for instance, the Sun Dance was revived, after a more complex societal shift is taking place than the theory of Pan-Indianism can account for.

An examination of the theory’s underpinnings may be critical at this point, especially given that native Americans themselves chafe most against the Pan-Indian classification. Like other assimilationist theories with which it is associated, the Pan-Indian view is predicated upon an a priori assumption about the nature of cultural contact: that upon contact there is no evidence that this is happening to native American groups.

Yet the fact remains that intertribal activities are a major facet of native American culture today. Certain dances at powwows, for instance, are announced as intertribal, other as traditional. Likewise, speeches given at the beginnings of powwows are often delivered in English, while the prayer that follows is usually spoken in a is the conscious distinction native Americans make between tribal and intertribal tendencies.

Tribalism, although greatly altered by modern history, remains a potent force among native Americans: It forms a basis for tribal identity, and aligns music and dance with other social and cultural activities important to individual tribes. Intertribal activities, on the other hand, reinforce this identity is directly threatened by outside influences.

What this question is testing

Paragraph Purpose

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
17.

The primary function of the third paragraph

Answer choices

  1. Opposite: corroborate1% picked this

    search for evidence to corroborate the basic assumption of the theory

    This is saying the author is trying to corroborate (i.e. support / make more true) the basic assumption of Pan-Indianism. But the author disagrees with Pan-Indianism. He is talking about its underlying assumption in order to say that this assumption is wrong (that's what the last sentence of the 3rd paragraph is doing).

  2. Wrong Emphasis: natives disagree5% picked this

    demonstrate the incorrectness of the theory of Pan-Indianism by pointing out that native American groups themselves

    While the first sentence of the paragraph does mention the fact that native American groups disagree with the Pan Indian theory, it's the side idea (and that topic isn't discussed in the rest of the 3rd paragraph). The main idea in the first sentence of the paragraph is that we should look at the theory's underpinnings, and the second sentence of the paragraph tells us the underlying assumption of the theory, which the final sentence then says is an untrue assumption in the case of native Americans. If anything, we'd want this answer to say, "demonstrate the incorrectness of the theory by pointing out that its underlying assumption doesn't hold true for native American groups".

  3. Out of Scope3% picked this

    explain the origin of the theory of Pan-Indianism by showing how it evolved from

    Out of Scope: showing how it evolved This is pretty tempting, since "explain the origin" sounds like it's reinforcing "an examination of the theory's underpinnings". And the second sentence does mention a similarity between Pan-Indianism and other assimilationist theories. But we were never told that Pan-Indianism evolved from these theories, only that it's associated with them. And the author never shows how Pan-Indianism evolved from these theories.

  4. Out of Scope: examine several1% picked this

    examine several assimilationist theories in order to demonstrate that they rest on

    The only theory really examined is the Pan-Indian one. In passing, the author tells us that the founding assumption of Pan-Indianism is similar to that of other assimilationist theories, but that doesn't mean that the author spend the 3rd paragraph examining several assimilationist theories.

  5. Correct89% picked this

    criticize the theory of Pan-Indianism by pointing out that it rests upon an assumption for which there

    Why this is right

    The author's overall purpose is Challenge Position, so we know the author wants to criticize Pan-Indianism. The 2nd paragraph ended with the author demonstrating that Pan-Indianism is clearly missing part of the story. The 3rd paragraph is saying, "let's look at the faulty idea that underlies this theory". The Pan-Indian view is predicated upon an assumption. However, there is no evidence that this is happening to native American groups. The strong wording of the final sentence justifies the strong wording of "for which there is no supporting evidence".

    Skill tested: Paragraph Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free