Reading Comprehension

PT101 · S4 · P2 · Q10 Native American Burials

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one
Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step
81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Many Native Americans view the archaeological excavation and museum display of ancestral skeletal remains and items buried with them as a spiritual desecration.

Topic

Legal challenges and considerations regarding Native American claims to ancestral graves and artifacts excavated by archaeologists and displayed in museums.

Framework

Problem / Solution

Main Point

While Native Americans face legal challenges in preventing the excavation and display of ancestral graves—especially when the graves are ancient—certain property laws and court rulings, like Charrier v. Bell, may offer support for their claims to ancestral artifacts and provide grounds for repatriation if standing can be established. (*The "Most Valuable Sentences" appear in the first paragraph: *)

P1: Legal Barriers to Native American Claims

Many Native Americans are deeply opposed to the excavation and display of their ancestors’ remains, but they face big legal hurdles in challenging these actions. Typically, courts grant "standing" only if the community is closely connected to the grave by time or geography. For very old, disconnected graves, it's much tougher to make a case—courts would have to stretch the usual legal interpretations. But if they can get standing, there are legal pathways for claims.

P2: Property Law as a Pathway

If Native Americans achieve standing, property law can help them reclaim grave goods. A key court case (Charrier v. Bell) clarified that objects buried with the dead aren’t “abandoned property,” so archaeologists can’t claim them for themselves. The court essentially said burial goods are meant to stay within the community, not become free for taking, suggesting such artifacts should go back to tribal representatives if they have standing.

P3: Individual vs. Communal Property Rights

The law treats communal tribal property differently from individual property. Just because a museum bought an artifact in good faith from an individual Native American, it doesn’t mean they have true legal title to it if it belonged to the tribe as a whole. Museums can’t assume they own communal artifacts just because they went through a legitimate sale with one person.

10.

It can be inferred that a court would be most likely to deny standing in a disinterment case to which one of the following Native American plaintiffs?

one who seeks, as one
Opposite
This presents one of the four cases where standing traditionally is granted, since it involves an heir to an estate. 1. you're the heir of the deceased 2. you own the property on which the grave is located 3. you are a party (such as an organization or distant relative) that has a clear interest in the preservation of a particular grave 4. the grave is of recent origin and associated with an identifiable Native American community
2% picked this
one who seeks to prevent
Opposite
This presents one of the four cases where standing traditionally is granted, since it involves a landowner. 1. you're the heir of the deceased 2. you own the property on which the grave is located 3. you are a party (such as an organization or distant relative) that has a clear interest in the preservation of a particular grave 4. the grave is of recent origin and associated with an identifiable Native American community
3% picked this
one who represents a tribe
Opposite
This doesn't quite present one of the four cases where standing is traditionally affirmed, but since the tribe recently moved from the location where the remains are buried, it matches up somewhat with the fourth case. 1. you're the heir of the deceased 2. you own the property on which the grave is located 3. you are a party (such as an organization or distant relative) that has a clear interest in the preservation of a particular grave 4. the grave is of recent origin and associated with an identifiable Native American community
19% picked this
one who seeks to have
Opposite
This presents one of the four cases where standing traditionally is granted, since it involves a 2nd cousin. 1. you're the heir of the deceased 2. you own the property on which the grave is located 3. you are a party (such as an organization or distant relative) that has a clear interest in the preservation of a particular grave 4. the grave is of recent origin and associated with an identifiable Native American community
5% picked this
Correct
one who seeks the return
Why this is right
This sounds the most like what we were looking for: - ancient grave - located in an area where the community of Native Americans associated has not recently lived This is an ancient grave, and the burial grounds were used for a bunch of different tribes, so it isn't likely that this land is "associated with an identifiable Native American community". The person seeking to re-claim these artifacts from the museum doesn't seem to be an heir or a distant relative. And these remains aren't found on their land (they are in a museum).
Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.
70% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free