Reading Comprehension

PT101 · S4 · P1 · Q1 P.D. James

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Start practicing free

Wherever the crime novels of P.

Topic

P. D. James’s crime novels and the debate over her place in literary and genre fiction.

Framework

Present Debate (with elements of Highlight Noteworthy)

Main Point

There is an ongoing debate among critics about whether P. D. James’s crime novels are high literature or just genre fiction, but the author suggests that James may be outgrowing the constraints of the crime-novel genre and might be ready to write mainstream literary fiction. *The Most Valuable Sentence:* Seen in the last paragraph —

P1: Framing the Debate About P. D. James

There's a split among critics about P. D. James — some overpraise her, others dismiss her as an overly ambitious genre writer. The whole debate is really rooted in a false split between "enjoyable" and "serious" fiction.

P2: Different Critics’ Views

Supporters say James writes with depth, intricate characters, and explores big ideas, while detractors think she's pretentious and not true to the detective genre. Some critics just want her to focus on classic whodunit tricks instead of being "literary."

P3: Balanced Assessment of James’s Work

The author thinks James writes well and gives depth to her characters and worlds, which is enjoyable — but admits these qualities can slow down or muddle the mystery plots. Sometimes, her mysteries are solved more by intuition than by clear clues, as she seems more invested in character than the mechanics of detection.

1.

Which one of the following best states the author’s main conclusion?

  1. Correct

    Because P. D. James’s potential

    Why this is right

    The opening clause here matches the author's evaluation of the Debate: James is a talented writer (she has a potential as a writer), but she's not nailing the crime detective genre (it's stifling her / "she needs to slide out of her handcuffs / the rules of her chosen genre cramp her creative thought"). The main clause matches the author's Solution: James should just embrace a future as a mainstream novelist, not a crime detective novelist.

    Skill tested: Main Point · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    82% picked this

  2. Because the requirements of the

    Too Strong: incompatible / diminished

    The author thinks that the "requirements" (i.e. the expected conventions) of the crime novel are limiting James's creative expression. But he isn't saying that requirements of the popular novels are irreconcilable with true creative expression. The main clause here is too pessimistic, since the author is saying, "You had a good run in the crime genre, but you're clearly ready to move on to mainstream novels", whereas this sounds more like "the popular novel has screwed over James's career".

    4% picked this

  3. The dichotomy between popular and

    Wrong Emphasis

    This answer sounds like a Theme / Example passage. This answer doesn't weigh-in on the debate over James; i.e. is she a dope crime novelist because she's more literary than most, or an annoying crime novelist because she's more literary than most? It doesn't mention the author's recommendation to Jame (move on from writing crime novels and just write regular mainstream novels). It makes it sound like the passage's central mission was to alert the reader to the dichotomy between popular and sophisticated literature.

    9% picked this

  4. The critics who have condemned

    Contradicted / Wrong Objection

    The author agrees with critics who find fault with James's detriments as a crime genre writer. He says in the 3rd paragraph that "her devices to advance the story can be shameless and thin, and it is often impossible to see how her detective arrives at the truth". So he does not think that she has carefully constructed plots, and he would not chastise critics for finding fault with her lack of attention to the specifics of detection.

    1% picked this

  5. Although her plots are not

    Opposite

    The opening language is great, but the main clause suggests the opposite of what the author's recommendation for James is. This answer makes it sound like the author is saying, "James, I fully support your justified decision to write in the crime-novel genre". When the author's main takeaway was, "James, it's time for you to leave the crime-novel genre behind and embrace the world of the mainstream novel."

    4% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill
LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free