The most successful economies have been, and will continue to be, those that train as many people as possible in the human skills required to research, to develop, and to apply new technology.
Facts
conditional
Most successful → trained max possible ppl economy for new tech
contrasts / similarities
Japan: does train max possible Europe: not so much (insufficient supply of workers who can use new tech and scientists to develop new tech)
pivot
Japan: shortage of qualified technical people + too many qualified only for menial tasks
most of Europe: too many qualified only for menial tasks
Evidence
It's not clear where this is headed, but the Pivot catches my eye. We had established that Japan was basically one of the best when it comes to training maximum people for new tech, and then a second later we hear .
That suggests that even if you do your best to train, you won't necessarily match the demand trained people.
We could also use the contrapositive of the conditional to say that most of Europe does not have the most successful economies, since they're not great at training people for new tech.
Goal
Who knows if this answer will compare Europe to Japan, address Japan's noble but insufficient efforts, or find a way to apply the conditional rule to say that . We'll look for the most provable answer.