Scientists attempting to replicate certain controversial results reported by a group of experienced researchers failed to get the same results as those reported. The conclusion drawn from this by the scientists who conducted the replication results had been due to faulty measurements.
What this question is testing
Your task
Find the assumption the argument requires in order for its conclusion to hold.
Common trap
Answers that would help the argument but aren't strictly required (sufficient, not necessary).
Winning move
Negate each choice — the right one breaks the argument when negated.
Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.