Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT8 S4 Q22 Explanation

Psychologists today recognize childhood

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsPrinciple-Strengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Psychologists today recognize childhood as a separate stage of life which can only be understood in its own terms, and they wonder why the Western world took so long to see the folly of regarding children simply as small, inadequately socialized adults. Most psychologists, however, persist in regarding people 70 to 90 therefore, to acknowledge that serious research into the unique psychology of advanced age has become indispensable.

What this question is testing

Principle-Strengthen

Conclusion

The author wants psychologists to take old age seriously as a distinct stage and study it accordingly.

Evidence

Two key facts. First: psychology already accepts childhood as a separate stage. Second: society's economic organization treats old age as fundamentally different too.

Evaluate

To strengthen this with a principle, we need a rule that connects the economic-organization fact to the call for distinct research. Something like: when society treats two age groups as fundamentally different in how its economic life is organized, those groups have their own distinct psychologies and should be studied accordingly.

Goal

Find the principle that bridges economic-organization → distinct psychology.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
22.

Which one of the following principles, if established, would provide the strongest backing

Answer choices

  1. Bad Trigger Match11% picked this

    Whenever current psychological practice conflicts with traditional attitudes toward people, those traditional attitudes should be changed to bring them in

    This principle says traditional attitudes should change to match psychology. But the argument runs the other direction — the author wants psychologists to recognize a distinction that society already recognizes. The trigger ("psychology vs. tradition conflict") doesn't match the situation.

  2. Bad Trigger Match7% picked this

    Whenever two groups of people are so related to each other that any member of the second group must previously have been a member

    This principle is about not treating one group as deviant members of another, when the first group must have been members of the second. That's about how to characterize people, not about whether to research them as a separate psychology. It also doesn't bridge the economic-organization premise to the research conclusion.

  3. Bad Trigger Match7% picked this

    Whenever most practitioners of a given discipline approach a particular problem in the same way, that uniformity is good evidence that all similar problems

    This is a methodological claim about uniformity of practitioner approach implying problems should be approached the same way. The argument is the opposite: the author wants old age treated differently from young/middle adulthood, not the same way. This principle would actually push against the conclusion.

  4. Correct60% picked this

    Whenever a society’s economic life is so organized that two distinct times of life are treated as being fundamentally different from one another, each

    Why this is right

    This is the bridge. The principle: whenever a society's economic life is organized to treat two times of life as fundamentally different, each can be understood only in terms of its own distinct psychology. The argument supplies the trigger: old age is treated as fundamentally different from young/middle adulthood, attested by the organization of modern social and economic life. Apply the principle and the conclusion follows: old age requires its own distinct psychology — i.e., serious research into it is indispensable.

    Skill tested: Principle-Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Bad Trigger Match15% picked this

    Whenever psychologists agree that a single psychology is inadequate for two distinct age groups, they should be prepared to show that there are greater

    This principle imposes a duty on psychologists who agree about inadequacy — to show certain group differences. The argument isn't about what psychologists should demonstrate after agreeing; it's about the case for studying old age separately. The trigger of this principle doesn't apply.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free