Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT8 S4 Q10 Explanation

A distemper virus has caused

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsNecessary Assumption

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

A distemper virus has caused two-thirds of the seal population in the North Sea to die since May 1988. The explanation for the deaths cannot rest here, however. There must be a reason the normally latent virus could prevail so suddenly: clearly the severe pollution of the North Sea seals so that they could no longer withstand the virus.

What this question is testing

Necessary Assumption

Your task

Find the assumption the argument requires in order for its conclusion to hold.

Common trap

Answers that would help the argument but aren't strictly required (sufficient, not necessary).

Winning move

Negate each choice — the right one breaks the argument when negated.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
10.

The argument concerning the immune system of the seals presupposes which one

Answer choices

  1. Out of Scope3% picked this

    There has been a gradual decline in the seal population of the North Sea during

    This answer discusses a historical decline in the seal population over the past two centuries, which isn't connected to the argument about the sudden prevalence of the virus since May 1988. The argument focuses on the recent deaths due to the virus, not long-term population trends.

  2. Opposite (if anything)\11% picked this

    No further sources of pollution have been added since May 1988 to the already existing sources of pollution

    If we negated this, it would sound like there is even more pollution than usual, which would strengthen the author's hypothesis that pollution was a causal factor.

  3. Correct79% picked this

    There was no sudden mutation in the distemper virus which would have allowed the virus successfully to attack healthy North

    Why this is right

    When we negate the lovable "no" in this Defender style choice, we get "There was a sudden mutation that allowed the virus to attack healthy seals". Boom, we weakened with an alternate explanation. It was pollution that caused the seals to suddenly be more vulnerable; it was the virus mutating into something much more dangerous."

    Skill tested: Necessary Assumption · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Irrelevant Comparison1% picked this

    Pollution in the North Sea is no greater than pollution in the Mediterranean Sea, off the coast of North America, or

    This option compares pollution levels in the North Sea to pollution in other bodies of water. The argument doesn't hinge on such comparisons, as its focus is solely on the impact of pollution in the North Sea on the seal immunity and virus virulence.

  5. Too Strong: nearly extinct5% picked this

    Some species that provide food for the seals have nearly become extinct as a result

    Even though the author thinks pollution is bad enough to impact the seals immune system and make them more vulnerable to the virus, she doesn't need to think that other species are on the bring of extinction from the pollution.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free