Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT6 S2 Q23 Explanation

Book Review: When I read a

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMust be True

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Start practicing free

Free to start

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Book Review: When I read a novel set in a city I know well, I must see that the writer knows the city at least as well as I do if I am to take that writer seriously. If the writer is faking, I know immediately and do not trust that writer. San Francisco. In this novel, as in his first, Lee passes my test with flying colors.

What this question is testing

Must be True

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
23.

Which one of the following can be properly inferred from

Answer choices

  1. Trap9% picked this

    The book reviewer enjoys virtually any novel written by a novelist

  2. Trap20% picked this

    If the book reviewer trusts the novelist as a storyteller, the novel in question must be set in a city

  3. Trap5% picked this

    Peter Lee’s first novel was set in

  4. Trap3% picked this

    The book reviewer does not trust any novel set in a city that she does

  5. Correct62% picked this

    The book reviewer does not believe that she knows San Francisco better than

    Why this is right

    Answer E is correct.

    Skill tested: Must be True · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill
LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free