Reading Comprehension

PT6 · S1 · P3 · Q15 Early Music Advocacy

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

In recent years the early music movement, which advocates performing a work as it was performed at the time of its composition, has taken on the character of a crusade, particularly as it has moved beyond the sphere of medieval and baroque music and into music from the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries by composers such as Mozart and Beethoven.

Topic

The early music movement's approach to historically authentic performance and its issues when applied to composers like Mozart and Beethoven.

Framework

Challenge Position

Main Point

The early music movement, while valuable in certain respects, is problematic when it insists on performing later works (Mozart, Beethoven) exactly as they were at the time of composition, because this approach ignores how composers imagined their music and how performance practices and audience expectations have evolved. Most Valuable Sentence: The main critique is introduced with (end of first paragraph) and expanded especially at the end: (end of final paragraph)

P1: Introduction and Set-up of the Problem

The passage opens by explaining that the early music movement argues for performing works as they were at the time of composition, even expanding into later composers like Mozart and Beethoven. The author acknowledges the benefits of historical knowledge, but signals that there are serious issues with this approach.

P2: Challenging the Assumptions about Instruments and Composer Intent

Here the author points out that early music fans assume composers only wrote for the instruments they had, but actually composers like Beethoven imagined sounds beyond their era’s instruments. The example of Beethoven’s concerto shows that insisting on only using period-accurate instruments can go against what composers would have wanted if better options were available.

P3: Problems with Historical Accuracy in Performance Practices

This paragraph discusses how efforts to recreate old performance practices (like having a clearly audible pianist leading the orchestra) can end up being less authentic and even miss the real context—such as why symphony tempos have shifted. The author argues that insisting on recreating the past can ignore changes in audience behavior and musical meaning, and that music must adapt to new cultural values and expectations.

15.

In the second paragraph, the author discusses Beethoven’s first piano concerto primarily in order to

  1. illustrate how piano music began

    Opposite: in response to

    This example is showing how piano music was writing stuff for an extended range of piano before those pianos even existed, not in response to them existing.

    2% picked this

  2. illustrate how Beethoven’s work failed

    Wrong Purpose: failed to anticipate

    As soon as we hit "failed" we should probably stop reading this answer. The author wasn't trying to say anything negative about Beethoven. The author is showing how Beethoven's desire to hear a high F-sharp clashes with the early music advocates' desire to perform music just as it was heard in its original time. But in this clash, the author is mad at the early music advocates, not at Beethoen.

    1% picked this

  3. suggest that early music advocates

    Out of Scope: revisions

    This is not an example where Beethoven originally composed a concerto and then years later revised it to have a high F-sharp. The original score had a high F-natural, but the author is saying "Beethoven would have wanted that to be a high F-sharp, if only existing pianos could produce that note". The point the author is making is that early music people often perform music that is true to the original score, rather than true to the composer's wishes.

    3% picked this

  4. Correct

    illustrate how composers like Beethoven

    Why this is right

    This is by far our best meaning match for the first sentence of the 2nd paragraph. Early music advocates assume composers wrote only for the instruments available to them. The author is rebutting that, showing that composers sometimes wrote music that called for notes (like a high F-sharp) that could not be played on currently available instruments.

    Skill tested: Local Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    93% picked this

  5. provide an example of a

    Opposite

    The whole point of the Beethoven example is that the composition was NOT amenable to pianos available at the time. He wanted a high F-sharp and pianos available at the time did not have that note.

    1% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free