The stated goal of the government’s funding program for the arts is to encourage the creation of works of artistic excellence.
Conclusion
Government funding of the arts cannot lead to the creation of works of true artistic excellence and is a burden on taxpayers.
Evidence
Senator Beton argues that government-funded artworks can never reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist. This is because artists will inevitably try to please those who control the distribution of financial support, just like anyone else who accepts support.
Evaluate
Senator Beton's argument hinges on the idea that true artistic excellence requires independence of artistic conscience, which government funding supposedly undermines. Therefore, the essence of the argument is about whether the need to cater to those who distribute funds necessarily eliminates the possibility of creating truly excellent art.
To understand the assumption, we need to consider why an artwork that lacks the independent conscience of its artist can't be a true work of artistic excellence.
Goal
Look for an assumption that links the dependence on financial supporters to the inability to achieve artistic excellence because it stifles artistic independence. We are looking for an answer that addresses this core link.