Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT5 S3 Q25 Explanation

Situation: In the island nation of Bezun

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsPrinciple-Conform

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Situation: In the island nation of Bezun, the government taxes gasoline heavily in order to induce people not to drive. It uses the revenue from the gasoline tax to reduce prices charged for electricity.

Analysis: The greater the success achieved in meeting the first of these objectives, the less will be the meeting the second.

What this question is testing

Principle-Conform

Situation

Bezun has a clever-sounding plan: heavily tax gas to make people drive less, and use that gas-tax money to subsidize electricity. Two birds, one stone.

Analysis

But there is a catch. The more successful the gas tax is at making people drive less, the less gas-tax revenue comes in — and so the less money there is to subsidize electricity. Success at the first goal undermines the second.

Evaluate

The pattern is: a tax that discourages activity A (drivers buying gas) funds a program for goal B (cheap electricity). The two goals are wired against each other — the more A drops, the less money for B.

Imagine a soda tax used to fund nutrition education: the better the soda tax works at stopping soda buying, the less money there is for the education program. Same trap.

Goal

Find the answer where a fee is used to discourage an activity, and the revenue from that fee is used to fund a secondary goal — making success at deterrence cut into the secondary goal's funding.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
25.

The analysis provided for the situation above would be most appropriate in which one of

Answer choices

  1. Bad Description18% picked this

    A library charges a late fee in order to induce borrowers to return books promptly. The library uses revenue from the late fee to

    The library uses late-fee revenue to send reminders aimed at the same goal — reducing overdue books. The two objectives are aligned, not in tension. In the original, the gas tax discourages driving while the revenue funds a separate goal (cheap electricity); success at driving-reduction does not help electricity prices. Here, both objectives serve the same end, so success on one would arguably help the other (or be neutral), not undermine it.

  2. Bad Description13% picked this

    A mail-order store imposes a stiff surcharge for overnight delivery in order to limit use of this option. The store uses revenue from the

    The store uses surcharge revenue to cover the costs of providing overnight delivery. Success at limiting overnight orders just reduces the costs and the revenue equally — there is no self-defeating tension between two separate goals. The structure is recovering costs of the very thing being discouraged, not funding a separate objective whose success depends on the deterrent failing.

  3. Bad Description3% picked this

    The park management charges an admission fee so that a park’s users will contribute to the park’s upkeep. In order to keep admission fees

    The park's admission fee is meant to make users contribute to upkeep — a single-goal, single-revenue structure. The clause about not financing new projects is a separate decision, not a second objective whose success is undermined by the first. There is no two-goal tension at all.

  4. Bad Description6% picked this

    A restaurant adds a service charge in order to spare customers the trouble of individual tips. The service charge is then shared among the

    The restaurant's service charge is not designed to discourage anything — it is designed to spare customers from tipping individually. So there is no "deterrence" goal whose success would defeat the second goal. The original argument hinges on a tax-as-deterrent that funds a separate goal; this lacks that deterrent dynamic.

  5. Correct60% picked this

    The highway administration charges a toll for crossing a bridge in order to get motorists to use other routes. It uses the revenue from

    Why this is right

    This is the same structure. A toll is charged to discourage motorists from using the bridge (objective 1, like the gas tax to discourage driving). The toll revenue is used to fund a reserve to build a new bridge (objective 2, like funding electricity subsidies). The more successful the toll is at deterring bridge use, the less toll revenue comes in, and the less money there is to build the new bridge. Success at objective 1 undermines objective 2 — exactly the trap in the Bezun example.

    Skill tested: Principle-Conform · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free