Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT5 S3 Q2 Explanation

Several studies have shown that

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsWeaken

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Several studies have shown that hospitals are not all equally successful: patients are much more likely to die in some of them than in others. Since the hospitals in the studies had approximately equal per-patient funding, differences in the quality probably responsible for the differences in mortality rates.

What this question is testing

Weaken

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion less likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that look negative but attack a claim the argument never relied on.

Winning move

Find the assumption the argument depends on, then pick the choice that undermines it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
2.

Which one of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the

Answer choices

  1. No Impact6% picked this

    The staff in some of the hospitals studied had earned more advanced degrees, on average, than the staff

    This answer doesn't directly address the core issue of why mortality rates differ. Even if staff have more advanced degrees, it doesn't necessarily mean they provide better or worse care. More advanced degrees could strengthen or undermine the argument, but without knowing how it impacts care, it's irrelevant.

  2. Correct85% picked this

    Patient populations vary substantially in average severity of illness from hospital

    Why this is right

    If patient populations vary substantially in average severity of illness from hospital to hospital, then it provides a strong alternate explanation for the mortality rate differences. A hospital may have a higher mortality rate not because of inferior quality of care, but because it admits patients with more severe health issues.

    Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. No Impact2% picked this

    The average number of years that staff members stay on at a given job varies considerably from

    This factor doesn't clearly impact the author's conclusion. It might barely support that staff stability correlates with care quality, but there’s no clear connection provided here to mortality rates specifically.

  4. No Impact4% picked this

    Approximately the same surgical procedures were performed in each of the hospitals covered

    Even if the same procedures were performed, it doesn’t necessarily mean that differences in mortality rates aren't due to staff quality. This fact doesn’t provide any new information that would weaken the quality of care explanation.

  5. No Impact4% picked this

    Mortality rates for hospital patients do not vary considerably from one region of the

    The lack of regional variation in mortality rates doesn't impact the argument about differences between hospitals. The comparison is irrelevant to the conclusion about quality of care across different hospitals. Answer (B) effectively provides an alternate explanation by suggesting patient severity as a reason for differing mortality rates, rather than just the quality of care.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free