Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT5 S1 Q5 Explanation

Recently, highly skilled workers in Eastern

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsWeaken

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Recently, highly skilled workers in Eastern Europe have left jobs in record numbers to emigrate to the West. It is therefore likely that skilled workers who remain in demand in their home countries.

What this question is testing

Weaken

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion less likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that look negative but attack a claim the argument never relied on.

Winning move

Find the assumption the argument depends on, then pick the choice that undermines it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
5.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens

Answer choices

  1. No Impact2% picked this

    Eastern European factories prefer to hire workers from their home countries rather than to import

    The preference of Eastern European factories for hiring workers from within the country doesn't address the overall demand for skilled workers. This claim does not weaken the argument that remaining skilled workers are in high demand.

  2. Correct80% picked this

    Major changes in Eastern European economic structures have led to the elimination of many positions previously held by

    Why this is right

    This suggests that the structures within Eastern Europe have changed, leading to the elimination of positions that skilled workers would typically fill. If many positions no longer exist, it weakly implies there may not be high demand for the remaining skilled workers, as jobs for them could be diminishing alongside emigration.

    Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. No Impact2% picked this

    Many Eastern European emigrants need to acquire new skills after finding work

    Whether many Eastern European emigrants need to acquire new skills after moving doesn't address the demand for the workers who remained behind. This detail is irrelevant to the argument about demand within Eastern Europe.

  4. No Impact11% picked this

    Eastern European countries plan to train many new workers to replace the highly skilled workers

    While planning to train new workers could impact future demand, it doesn't address the current situation. The argument is about the current demand for remaining skilled workers, not the potential future supply of skilled labor.

  5. Opposite Impact5% picked this

    Because of the departure of skilled workers from Eastern European countries, many positions

    This choice actually supports the argument rather than weakens it. If many positions are unfilled due to emigration, it suggests that there would be high demand for the skilled workers who stay, as they would be needed to fill these gaps.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free